was tested

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was tested" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has undergone a test or evaluation, such as, "The new software was tested for accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Their bond was tested.

The New York Times

His skill was tested.

Independent

"That was tested".

The New Yorker

Their faith was tested.

The New York Times

My blood was tested.

The New York Times - Health

Their enthusiasm was tested.

The New York Times

Pak was tested today.

The New York Times - Sports

The function was tested extensively.

The Guardian

So Viagra, too, was tested.

The New York Times - Magazine

But her faith was tested.

The Guardian

The car was tested Monday.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was tested", ensure the context clearly indicates what was tested and the purpose of the testing. For instance, specify the criteria against which something was tested or the method used during the test.

Common error

Avoid using "was tested" without specifying what performed the test or the conditions under which it was performed. For example, instead of saying "The product was tested", specify "The product was tested by an independent laboratory under extreme conditions".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was tested" functions as a passive verb construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence underwent a process of examination or trial. This construction is used to emphasize the object of the action rather than the actor. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and frequent usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

32%

News & Media

56%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was tested" is a common and grammatically correct passive verb phrase used to indicate that something has undergone an evaluation or trial. Ludwig AI confirms that its widespread usage is evident across various domains, including science, news, and academia. When using "was tested", clarity is key; specify what was tested, by whom, and under what conditions. Alternatives like "was evaluated" or "underwent testing" can be used for variety, though "was tested" remains a versatile and frequently encountered choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

underwent testing

Emphasizes the action of going through a testing process.

was evaluated

Focuses on the assessment of value or quality.

was examined

Highlights a detailed inspection or investigation.

was assessed

Suggests a systematic appraisal or estimation.

was put to the test

Emphasizes the challenge or trial aspect of testing.

was trialed

A more formal term for undergoing a trial or experiment.

was subjected to scrutiny

Highlights the aspect of being carefully and critically examined.

was verified

Focuses on confirming the truth or accuracy.

was validated

Suggests confirmation of the accuracy or legitimacy.

was checked

Implies a simple verification process.

FAQs

How can I use "was tested" in a sentence?

You can use "was tested" to indicate that something underwent a process to evaluate its quality, performance, or reliability. For instance, "The software was tested for bugs" or "The hypothesis was tested through experimentation".

What can I say instead of "was tested"?

You can use alternatives like "was evaluated", "was examined", or "underwent testing" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "was tested" or "has been tested"?

The choice between "was tested" and "has been tested" depends on the context and the time frame you want to emphasize. "Was tested" refers to a completed action in the past, while "has been tested" implies the testing occurred at some point in the past and may have relevance to the present.

What is the difference between "was tested" and "was verified"?

"Was tested" implies a thorough evaluation or trial, while "was verified" suggests that something was checked for accuracy or truth. Testing aims to assess performance, while verification aims to confirm correctness.