was sufficient

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was sufficient" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something met the necessary requirements or standards in a particular context. Example: "The evidence presented in court was sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"That was sufficient then.

The New York Times

Glory was sufficient.

The New Yorker

Nader was sufficient unto himself.

The New Yorker

All they needed was sufficient money.

The Guardian - Film

It was sufficient to end her candidacy.

The New York Times

That was sufficient for Piasecki for now.

The New Yorker

Chief Justice George said neither was sufficient.

The New York Times

Between New Yorkers the shrug was sufficient.

The New York Times

"Draw your own conclusion if it was sufficient".

The New York Times

I thought my statement last night was sufficient," he said.

The Guardian - Sport

By spring training, he said, the protection was sufficient.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was sufficient", ensure the context clearly indicates what standard or requirement is being met. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "was sufficient" when a stronger term like 'optimal' or 'excellent' is more accurate. Overusing "was sufficient" can make your writing sound less precise and impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was sufficient" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a subject's state of being adequate or meeting a particular requirement. Ludwig AI indicates correctness and usability in various contexts. Examples show its use in contexts like evidence being sufficient or a measure being sufficient.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

46%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was sufficient" is a versatile and grammatically correct way to indicate that something met a necessary requirement or standard. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely used and understood. It appears most frequently in news and scientific contexts, demonstrating its relevance across various domains. When writing, ensure the context is clear about what standard is being met to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "proved adequate" or "satisfied the requirements" can offer subtle variations in meaning. Ludwig's extensive examples illustrate the phrase's broad applicability and correct usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

satisfied the requirements

Stresses the fulfillment of necessary conditions or demands.

proved satisfactory

Highlights that something has been assessed and found to be acceptable.

proved adequate

Emphasizes that something has been tested and found to meet the requirements.

served its purpose

Highlights that something fulfilled its intended function or role.

met the criteria

Focuses on satisfying a specific set of standards or conditions.

turned out to be enough

Highlights the outcome or result of something being adequate.

was up to par

Indicates that something met the expected level of quality or performance.

was ample

Suggests that there was more than enough of something, implying abundance.

was capable

Implies that something had the ability or capacity to meet the need.

did the trick

An informal way of saying something achieved the desired result.

FAQs

How can I use "was sufficient" in a sentence?

Use "was sufficient" to indicate that something met a necessary requirement or standard. For example, "The evidence presented "was sufficient" to prove the case."

What are some alternatives to "was sufficient"?

You can use alternatives such as "proved adequate", "satisfied the requirements", or "turned out to be enough depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was sufficient" or "was enough"?

"Was sufficient" is generally more formal than "was enough". The choice depends on the tone and context of your writing. "Was sufficient" is often preferred in academic or professional settings.

What's the difference between "was sufficient" and "was adequate"?

While both terms suggest meeting a need, "was sufficient" often implies meeting a specific requirement or standard, whereas "was adequate" suggests a more general level of acceptability or suitability. The nuance depends on context.