Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was successfully validated
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was successfully validated" is correct and can be used in written English.
You could use it to describe a process or procedure that has been verified, approved, or confirmed. For example, "The new system was successfully validated and is now ready to be implemented."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The clinical prediction rule was successfully validated in the validation cohort consisting of 116 children.
Science
The procedure was successfully validated.
Science
The system was successfully validated with several public datasets.
The nanoelectronic memory was successfully validated by simulation.
Science
The method was successfully validated by Monte-Carlo sampling.
Since July 2010, our participation to DEQAS was successfully validated.
Science
The solid-phase model was successfully validated against published data.
Science
This was successfully validated against the directly measured GRF.
Science
The reliability of the model used was successfully validated by additional tests.
Science
In these tests, the rake was successfully validated at different installation angles and cross-wind situations.
The meta-model was successfully validated by comparing its predictions to results from additional CFD simulations.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was successfully validated", ensure the context clearly indicates the method or criteria against which the validation was performed. For instance, specify "The model was successfully validated against experimental data."
Common error
Avoid using "was successfully validated" without specifying what the subject was validated against. This omission can leave the statement vague and less convincing. Always clarify the basis of validation to enhance clarity and credibility.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was successfully validated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something has undergone a process of validation and has met the required standards. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness and usability in written English.
Frequent in
Science
98%
Formal & Business
1%
News & Media
1%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was successfully validated" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase, especially within scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI indicates, it effectively communicates that something has undergone validation and met certain criteria. When using this phrase, be sure to specify the method or criteria against which the validation was performed to enhance clarity and credibility. Alternative phrases like "was effectively verified" or "was reliably demonstrated" can be used to convey similar meanings, but it’s crucial to maintain context-specific accuracy.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was effectively verified
Replaces "successfully validated" with "effectively verified", focusing on the verification aspect.
was properly verified
Substitutes "successfully validated" with "properly verified", highlighting the correctness of the verification process.
was thoroughly checked
Replaces "validated" with "checked", indicating a detailed and comprehensive review.
was accurately confirmed
Switches "validated" to "confirmed", emphasizing the accuracy of the affirmation.
was reliably demonstrated
Changes "validated" to "demonstrated", showing that something was proven through a reliable method.
was conclusively proven
Replaces "successfully validated" with "conclusively proven", stressing the definitive nature of the proof.
was determined to be valid
Rephrases "was successfully validated" to "was determined to be valid", focusing on the determination of validity.
was found to be correct
Changes "validated" to "found to be correct", indicating the discovery of correctness.
was confirmed as accurate
Emphasizes the confirmation of accuracy rather than the validation process.
was verified with success
Inverts the structure to place emphasis on the successful nature of the verification.
FAQs
How can I use "was successfully validated" in a sentence?
Use "was successfully validated" to indicate that a method, model, or system has been proven effective or accurate through testing or comparison. For example, "The new algorithm "was successfully validated" using a large dataset."
What are some alternatives to "was successfully validated"?
You can use alternatives such as "was effectively verified", "was properly verified", or "was reliably demonstrated" to convey similar meanings.
Is it necessary to specify the validation method when using "was successfully validated"?
Yes, specifying the validation method adds clarity and credibility. For example, instead of just saying "The method was successfully validated", specify "The method "was successfully validated" against established standards."
What does it mean for something to be "successfully validated"?
When something ""was successfully validated"", it means that it has undergone testing or scrutiny and has been confirmed to meet certain criteria or standards, proving its accuracy or effectiveness.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested