was subsumed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was subsumed by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been absorbed or incorporated into something larger or more comprehensive. Example: "The smaller company was subsumed by the larger corporation, losing its identity in the process."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

Warburg later was subsumed by UBS.

The New York Times

After about a day, every feature was subsumed by swelling.

The New Yorker

It felt as if the world was subsumed by cascades of unceasing despair.

The New Yorker

The oligarchic class was subsumed by the bureaucratic and political élite, who, in effect, renationalized corruption.

The New Yorker

"Some of it was subsumed by more current work," reflecting changes in the region, she said.

The New York Times

The agency was subsumed by Ordnance Survey in 1984 and was renamed the Overseas Surveys Directorate.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

It has been subsumed by myth and propaganda.

The New Yorker

Alphabet City might not have been subsumed by the East Village.

The New York Times

Individual moments of drama are subsumed by an overriding slickness.

The New York Times - Arts

Movie studios have been subsumed by media empires.

The New York Times

These last two are scheduled to be subsumed by the clumsily named International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was subsumed by" when you want to express that one entity has been completely absorbed or incorporated into another, often implying a loss of distinct identity.

Common error

Avoid using "was subsumed by" in very informal writing. Simpler phrases like "was absorbed by" or "became part of" may be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was subsumed by" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has been absorbed or incorporated into something else. Ludwig confirms its correct usage as highlighted in the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Encyclopedias

21%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Science

9%

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was subsumed by" is a versatile and grammatically correct expression used to indicate the absorption or incorporation of one entity into another. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase appears frequently in formal and neutral contexts such as news articles, encyclopedias, and academic papers. While alternatives like ""was absorbed by"" or "was incorporated into" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey, "was subsumed by" provides a concise way to express the idea of one thing being completely taken over by another, often resulting in a loss of its original identity. When writing, be mindful of the context and avoid using "was subsumed by" in overly casual or informal situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was absorbed by

Emphasizes the process of being taken in or assimilated by something else.

was incorporated into

Highlights the inclusion of something into a larger structure or entity.

was integrated into

Suggests a blending or merging into a unified whole.

was merged with

Implies a combining of two or more entities into one.

was overtaken by

Focuses on being surpassed or superseded by something more powerful or significant.

was eclipsed by

Highlights the loss of prominence or importance due to something overshadowing it.

was overshadowed by

Similar to 'eclipsed by', but emphasizes a lack of visibility or recognition.

was enveloped by

Suggests being completely surrounded or covered, often implying a loss of individual identity.

was engulfed by

Similar to 'enveloped', but often carries a sense of being overwhelmed or destroyed.

was superseded by

Emphasizes the replacement of something by something newer or more advanced.

FAQs

How can I use "was subsumed by" in a sentence?

The phrase "was subsumed by" indicates that something has been absorbed or incorporated into something larger. For example, "The smaller company "was absorbed by" the larger corporation" or "The agency "was integrated into" another department".

What are some alternatives to "was subsumed by"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as ""was absorbed by"", "was incorporated into", or "was merged with".

Is it correct to say "became subsumed by" instead of "was subsumed by"?

Yes, "became subsumed by" is also correct, although "was subsumed by" is more common. "Became subsumed by" suggests a process leading to the state of being subsumed, while "was subsumed by" simply describes the state.

What's the difference between "was subsumed by" and "was replaced by"?

"Was subsumed by" implies absorption or incorporation, where the original entity loses its distinct identity within a larger whole. "Was replaced by", on the other hand, means that the original entity is no longer present and has been succeeded by something else. For example, "Google Local "was replaced by" Google Maps".