Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was started
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was started" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is a past tense verb phrase and can be used in a sentence to describe an action that began in the past. Example: The project was started by a team of dedicated volunteers three years ago.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Zipcar was started in 2000.
News & Media
Ideame was started in 2011.
News & Media
Ryze.com was started first.
News & Media
"This process was started.
News & Media
Tunnel No. 1 was started in 1907.
News & Media
The collection was started in 1915.
News & Media
He was started on intravenous fluids.
News & Media
She was started on a blood thinner.
News & Media
They believe the fire was started deliberately.
News & Media
It was started in a garage.
News & Media
The program was started in 1960.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was started" when indicating the commencement of an action, project, or process. Ensure the subject performing the action is clear for effective communication.
Common error
Avoid replacing "was started" with an active voice construction if the actor is unknown or unimportant. Using the active voice incorrectly can lead to awkward or unclear sentences.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was started" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that an action or process was initiated by an unspecified or less important agent. This is confirmed by Ludwig AI.
Frequent in
News & Media
45%
Science
40%
Formal & Business
15%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was started" is a common and grammatically sound passive verb phrase used to indicate the initiation of an action or process. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide usage across various contexts, particularly in News & Media and Science. While alternatives like "was commenced" or "was initiated" exist, "was started" maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse communication needs. When using the phrase, ensure clarity regarding the subject and avoid misusing the active voice. Given its frequent occurrence and broad applicability, "was started" is a valuable and reliable phrase for expressing the commencement of events.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was commenced
Implies a more formal or official beginning than "was started".
was initiated
Suggests a more deliberate and planned beginning, often with a specific purpose.
was launched
Commonly used for projects, products, or campaigns.
was begun
A more literary or archaic alternative to "was started".
was created
Focuses on the act of creation or making something new.
was established
Emphasizes the setting up or founding of something with the intention of permanence.
originated
Highlights the point of origin or the source from which something arose.
came into existence
A more descriptive way of saying something began to exist.
was founded
Specifically refers to the establishment of an organization or institution.
took place
Emphasizes the occurrence or happening of an event.
FAQs
How can I use "was started" in a sentence?
Use "was started" to describe the beginning of an action or process in the past, where the focus is on the action itself rather than the actor. For example, "The project "was started" last year".
What are some alternatives to "was started"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "was commenced", "was initiated", or "was launched" to convey a similar meaning with slightly different emphasis.
Is it better to use "was started" or "began"?
Both "was started" and "began" can be correct, but "was started" is often used in the passive voice to emphasize the action rather than the actor, while "began" is active and puts the focus on who or what initiated the action.
What's the difference between "was started" and "was established"?
"Was started" generally refers to the commencement of an activity or process. "Was established", on the other hand, typically refers to the founding or creation of something more permanent, like an organization or institution.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested