Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was solely for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was solely for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was intended exclusively for a specific purpose or reason. Example: "The funding was solely for the development of new educational programs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

"Prisoners wanted their own newspaper that was solely for them," he says.

News & Media

The Guardian

The pioneering radiation centre was solely for women, organised and staffed by women.

Unlike the Dubai trip, this one was solely for the CIA.

News & Media

The Guardian

This video was solely for catharsis, and for my own eyes.

News & Media

The Guardian

When the 47-year old Gonzales first conceived the idea, it was solely for the unique challenge.

Rather, my use was solely for the purpose of accelerating the healing process of injuries I sustained while playing football".

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

*Amounts are solely for demonstration purposes.

Soon feats like those will not be solely for superheroes.

The nature of this fellowship is solely for financial support.

This document is solely for use by MIT Sloan MBA applicants.

Two of these are solely for pedestrian use.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was solely for", ensure that the context clearly defines the intended purpose or recipient to avoid any confusion.

Common error

Avoid using "was solely for" in overly complex sentences where simpler phrasing can improve clarity. Break down complex ideas into shorter, more direct statements.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was solely for" functions as a restrictive modifier, limiting the purpose or recipient of something. It clarifies that the subject in question had only one intention or designated use. Ludwig AI confirms this.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Academia

8%

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was solely for" is a versatile construction used to emphasize the exclusive nature of an action, purpose, or design. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used in various contexts. Analysis of numerous examples reveals its prevalence across News & Media, Scientific, and Formal & Business domains. While alternatives such as "was exclusively for" and "was entirely for" exist, "was solely for" provides a distinct emphasis on the singularity of the intent. Use this phrase to ensure clarity and prevent any ambiguity regarding the intended purpose, or sole recipient, of something. Remember to tailor your language to suit the context and avoid overcomplicating your sentence construction.

FAQs

How can I use "was solely for" in a sentence?

Use "was solely for" to indicate that something was intended for only one purpose. For example, "The donation "was solely for" disaster relief".

What's a more formal alternative to "was solely for"?

For a more formal tone, consider using "was exclusively for" or "was entirely for" to convey a similar meaning with greater emphasis on exclusivity.

Is it correct to say "was only for" instead of "was solely for"?

Yes, "was only for" is a correct and more common alternative to "was solely for". However, "was solely for" emphasizes the singular and exclusive nature of the purpose more strongly.

How does using "solely" change the meaning compared to "primarily"?

"Solely" indicates that something is exclusively for a single purpose, whereas "primarily" suggests it's mainly for one purpose but may have other secondary uses or intentions. So ""was solely for"" is more restrictive than "was primarily for".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: