Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was significantly increased

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was significantly increased" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an amount or measure that has been significantly increased. For example, "The number of houses sold in the city last year was significantly increased from the previous year."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She said the proportion was significantly increased.

News & Media

The New York Times

H.D.L. cholesterol was significantly increased in the placebo group compared with the garlic group.

News & Media

The New York Times

The PCE was significantly increased to threefold.

The granulocytes percentage was significantly increased.

PRISM score was significantly increased in hyperglycemia group.

The peak gain was significantly increased with tunable laser wavelength.

Hence, cellular energy allocation (CEA) was significantly increased.

vWF was significantly increased (from 8.2% to 58.55%).

In group 1, cellular proliferation was significantly increased.

In general, after baking protein digestion was significantly increased.

Threonine digestibility was significantly increased by RP (P < 0.05).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was significantly increased", ensure that the context clearly defines what caused the increase and that the measurement of increase is quantifiable, providing a clear understanding of the change.

Common error

Avoid using "was significantly increased" without specifying the original value or providing context for the significance. Without this information, the statement lacks impact and may be misinterpreted.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was significantly increased" primarily functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something experienced a notable rise. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and usable. It’s typically used to describe a change in quantity, value, or intensity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was significantly increased" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and news contexts, as supported by Ludwig AI. It effectively conveys that a measurable entity has experienced a noteworthy rise. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to provide sufficient context, detailing the cause and magnitude of the increase for clarity. While alternatives like "rose substantially" or "increased markedly" exist, "was significantly increased" is widely accepted and understood, especially when used in formal writing.

FAQs

How can I use "was significantly increased" in a sentence?

Use "was significantly increased" to describe a measurable rise. For example, "The patient's heart rate "was significantly increased" after administering the medication".

What are some alternatives to using "was significantly increased"?

Depending on the context, consider alternatives like "rose substantially", "increased markedly", or "expanded significantly".

Is it better to say "increased significantly" or "was significantly increased"?

Both "increased significantly" and "was significantly increased" are grammatically correct, but they serve different functions. "Increased significantly" is active, while "was significantly increased" is passive. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the agent causing the increase or the object that experienced the increase.

What does it mean when something "was significantly increased"?

It means that there has been a notable and statistically meaningful rise in the quantity, level, or intensity of something. The term "significantly" implies that the change is not due to random chance.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: