Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was significantly high
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was significantly high" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a measurement or value that is notably above a certain level or standard. Example: "The temperature recorded during the heatwave was significantly high, reaching levels not seen in decades."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Sandra Miniutti, a vice president of Charity Navigator, which rates nonprofit organizations, said Sunkin's pay was "significantly high for a charity of that size".
News & Media
Medication, medical supplies and equipment cost was significantly high.
Science
Among the analyzed vegetables, Cd accumulation was significantly high (p < 0.05) in Lactuca sativa var.
The mean of waiting with a related filler was significantly high compared to the other types.
Science
The percentage of selectivity rate of the optimized sensor was significantly high.
Science
Meanwhile, antifungal activity against C. albicans was significantly high for F5.
Science
The length of hair shaft elongated was significantly high by the hydrogel incorporating every growth factor.
Science
Compared with lignite combustion at 900 °C, the production of CO and hydrogen was significantly high.
Science
The number of I/D problems was significantly high in the solving group but significantly low in the control group.
The number of increase was significantly high in the reproduction-s group but significantly low in the control group.
The ALP activity was significantly high in CHA scaffold treated osteoblast cells, which suggests an enhanced bone-healing process.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was significantly high", ensure you provide context by explaining why the level is significant and what implications it has within your argument or analysis. For instance, mention the comparison group or the expected level.
Common error
Avoid using "was significantly high" without quantifying the increase or providing a reference point. For example, instead of saying "The risk was significantly high", specify "The risk was significantly high (30%) compared to the control group (10%)."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was significantly high" functions as a descriptive predicate, indicating that a particular attribute or measurement reached a level that is notably above a defined or expected threshold. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness.
Frequent in
Science
93%
News & Media
5%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was significantly high" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to describe an attribute or measurement that is notably above a defined or expected threshold. Ludwig confirms its validity, indicating its reliability in written English. The phrase is most frequently used in scientific and academic contexts to emphasize notable findings or data points. When using this phrase, it is important to provide sufficient context and quantification to clarify the significance of the high level. Alternatives such as "was considerably elevated" or "was markedly elevated" can be used for variety, while maintaining a similar meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was considerably elevated
This alternative emphasizes the substantial increase or rise in a value or measurement.
was markedly elevated
This suggests a noticeable and distinct increase above a certain level.
was substantially increased
Focuses on the significant amount by which something has grown or risen.
was notably greater
Indicates a clear and observable difference in magnitude.
was remarkably higher
Highlights the exceptional or surprising degree of increase.
was conspicuously high
Implies that the level was obvious and easily noticeable.
reached a high level
Describes the attainment of an elevated point or degree.
showed a significant increase
Highlights the change rather than the final value.
exhibited a high degree
Focuses on the characteristic or quality being present to a large extent.
was exceptionally above average
This emphasizes the comparison to what is normally expected.
FAQs
How can I use "was significantly high" in a sentence?
You can use "was significantly high" to describe a measurement or value that is notably above a certain level or standard. For example: "The temperature recorded during the heatwave "was significantly high", reaching levels not seen in decades."
What are some alternatives to "was significantly high"?
Alternatives include "was considerably elevated", "was markedly elevated", or "was substantially increased", depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "was significantly high" or "was significantly higher"?
The choice depends on the context. "Was significantly high" describes a state, while "was significantly higher" implies a comparison. For example: "The risk "was significantly high"" versus "The risk "was significantly higher" than last year".
When is it appropriate to use "was significantly high" in formal writing?
It's appropriate in formal writing when you want to emphasize that a certain level or amount is notably above what is typical or expected. Make sure to provide supporting data or context to justify the significance of the high level.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested