was significantly different

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was significantly different" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a notable distinction or change between two or more subjects, often in research or comparative contexts. Example: "The results of the experiment showed that the control group was significantly different from the experimental group in terms of behavior."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In addition to the geographic differences, the demographic breakdown was significantly different from the original district.

Huffington Post

(Liu maintains that his proof was significantly different from Givental's).

The New Yorker

Experimental cartilage was significantly different from controls.

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

The atmosphere in the school was significantly different to the norm.

The Guardian

The wGRS was significantly different between cases and controls (P < 2 × 10 -16 10 -16

Stanford University

Time to create entries was significantly different with each interface (F2,10 = 27.49, p<0.01).

Stanford University

Weed biomass was significantly different by variety but not by seeding rate.

Cornell University

&p < 0.05: GH-treated group was significantly different from CS + GH group at protein level.

Nature

The GR area under the curve was significantly different between meals (P=0.040).

Nature

The citrate content was significantly different between some allele combinations (Fig. 3e).

Nature

The brain activity of founder entrepreneurs was significantly different, compared to the non-entrepreneurs.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was significantly different", ensure you provide context regarding what aspects were different and, if possible, quantify the difference with data or statistics to enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "was significantly different" without supporting evidence or statistical analysis. Overstating significance can weaken your argument and mislead readers.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was significantly different" functions as a descriptive element, asserting that a notable distinction exists between two or more entities, conditions, or situations. Ludwig shows its common usage in diverse contexts, emphasizing the presence of a clear and meaningful variance.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

Academia

20%

News & Media

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was significantly different" is a common and grammatically correct way to express a notable distinction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used in scientific, academic, and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context to clarify the nature and extent of the difference. While primarily found in formal settings, its clear and direct meaning makes it versatile for various professional communication styles. To add even more impact, consider quantifying the difference with data wherever possible.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

differed substantially

Emphasizes a large degree of difference.

varied considerably

Highlights the variation to a notable extent.

was markedly distinct

Stresses the clear and obvious difference.

showed a significant divergence

Focuses on the act of diverging or moving apart.

exhibited a notable contrast

Points out the contrasting aspects.

presented a major deviation

Highlights the departure from a norm or standard.

displayed considerable dissimilarity

Emphasizes lack of similarity.

was distinctly dissimilar

Emphasizes the clear lack of likeness.

differed in a major way

Highlights the importance of the difference.

showed considerable variation

Highlights that there is an observable difference.

FAQs

How can I use "was significantly different" in a sentence?

Use "was significantly different" to highlight a notable distinction between two or more subjects. For example, "The experimental group's performance "was significantly different" from the control group's results".

What are some alternatives to "was significantly different"?

You can use alternatives like "differed substantially", "varied considerably", or "was markedly distinct" depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to provide statistical data when saying something "was significantly different"?

While not always mandatory, providing statistical data strengthens your claim and adds credibility. Without data, the assertion might be viewed as subjective. However, in non-scientific contexts, a qualitative description of the difference can suffice.

What's the difference between "was significantly different" and "was slightly different"?

"Was significantly different" indicates a notable and important distinction, whereas "was slightly different" suggests a minor and less impactful variation. The choice depends on the magnitude of the difference you wish to convey.