was significant

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was significant" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that had an important impact or meaning in a particular context or situation. Example: "The discovery of penicillin was significant in the field of medicine, revolutionizing the treatment of bacterial infections."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That was significant.

The New York Times

Tenet's involvement was significant.

The New Yorker

The loss was significant.

The New York Times

But it was significant.

The New York Times

The adjustment was significant.

The New York Times

Ken's baggage was significant.

The Guardian

There was significant intermarriage.

The New York Times - Magazine

The cost was significant.

The Guardian - Opinion

This was significant.

The Washington Post

Nonetheless, this synchronicity was significant.

The New Yorker

I knew it was significant".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was significant", ensure the context clearly indicates what made the subject significant. Provide specific details to support your claim and avoid vague statements.

Common error

Avoid using "was significant" when the impact or importance is minimal or subjective. Use stronger language only when the significance is genuinely substantial and can be supported by evidence or data.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was significant" functions as a predicate adjective, modifying the subject of a sentence to indicate its importance, impact, or meaning. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used and grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Academia

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was significant" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote importance or impact. As Ludwig AI highlights, it's correct and widely applicable, particularly in news, academic, and scientific writing. To use it effectively, ensure the context clearly defines why something "was significant", providing specific details to support your claim. While versatile, avoid overusing it in situations where the significance is overstated or subjective. Consider alternatives like "was important" or "was crucial" for subtle variations in meaning. Overall, "was significant" is a valuable tool for expressing consequence and meaning in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was important

Replaces "significant" with a more general term for importance, suitable for most contexts.

was crucial

Emphasizes the critical necessity of something.

was vital

Highlights the essential nature of something for survival or success.

was noteworthy

Draws attention to something deserving of notice or attention.

was substantial

Indicates a considerable amount or degree.

carried weight

Implies influence or importance in a decision or situation.

mattered greatly

Expresses that something had a large impact or influence.

proved decisive

Highlights the role of something in determining an outcome.

was consequential

Emphasizes the far-reaching effects or implications of something.

held significance

A more formal way of saying something was important or meaningful.

FAQs

How can I use "was significant" in a sentence?

Use "was significant" to describe something that had an important effect or meaning. For example, "The increase in sales "was significant", indicating a positive trend."

What can I say instead of "was significant"?

You can use alternatives like "was important", "was crucial", or "was noteworthy" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was very significant"?

Yes, "was very significant" is grammatically correct, but consider whether a stronger single word like "was critical" or "was essential" might be more impactful.

What is the difference between "was significant" and "was relevant"?

"Was significant" implies importance or impact, while "was relevant" means something was related to or applicable to the matter at hand. Something can be relevant without being significant, and vice versa.