was set aside for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was set aside for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been reserved or allocated for a specific purpose or person. Example: "The funds were set aside for community development projects to improve local infrastructure."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Arts

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

About $500,000 was set aside for the finals alone.

The New York Times - Sports

Initially, no money was set aside for Curate NYC.

The New York Times - Arts

Some land was set aside for parks, wilderness and conservation.

The New York Times

McMahon's share was set aside for his family.

The New York Times

Of that, $1.6 billion was set aside for residential construction.

The New York Times

Sunday morning was set aside for side-by-side massages.

The New York Times - Travel

A separate section was set aside for "first responders," principally firefighters and police officers.

The New York Times

The morning of the third day was set aside for the hippic events.

The New Yorker

(He told Lexi that he believed the term "marriage" was "set aside for man and woman").

The New Yorker

A compromise was reached under which a small plot was set aside for Rubinstein's grave.

The New York Times - Arts

In 1858, $250,000 (about $3.1 million in today's money) was set aside for the building.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was set aside for" to clearly indicate that something has been specifically reserved or allocated for a particular purpose or recipient. This phrase is suitable for both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was set aside for" when a more precise term like "allocated" or "designated" would better reflect the specific nature of the allocation. Overusing the phrase can make your writing less impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was set aside for" functions as a passive verb construction indicating that something was specifically reserved or allocated for a particular purpose. Ludwig AI shows its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was set aside for" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression that indicates something has been reserved or allocated for a specific purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its versatility across various writing styles, from formal reports to news articles. While alternatives like "was reserved for" or "was allocated to" exist, understanding the nuances of each can enhance the precision of your writing. As a final suggestion, it's beneficial to ensure that a more accurate term is not needed instead of "was set aside for" to keep the writing concise and impactful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was reserved for

Focuses specifically on the act of keeping something back for a particular purpose or person.

was allocated to

Implies a formal distribution or assignment of resources to a specific recipient or purpose.

was earmarked for

Suggests that something has been specifically designated for a particular use or recipient.

was designated for

Emphasizes an official or formal assignment of something for a specific purpose.

was intended for

Highlights the purpose or aim for which something was originally meant.

was put by for

Indicates saving something for a future use or need.

was saved for

Similar to 'put by for', but can also refer to emotional or abstract things.

was portioned out for

Implies dividing something into shares for a specific purpose.

was assigned to

Suggests a formal task or duty given to someone or something.

was held in reserve for

Implies keeping something back as a backup or for unforeseen circumstances.

FAQs

How can I use "was set aside for" in a sentence?

You can use "was set aside for" to indicate that something has been reserved or allocated for a specific purpose. For example, "A portion of the budget "was set aside for" research and development".

What are some alternatives to "was set aside for"?

You can use alternatives such as "was reserved for", "was allocated to", or "was earmarked for" depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "was set aside for" in formal writing?

Yes, "was set aside for" is appropriate for both formal and informal writing. However, in very formal contexts, you might consider using more precise terms like "was designated for" or "was allocated to".

What is the difference between "was set aside for" and "was saved for"?

"Was set aside for" typically implies a more formal or deliberate allocation, while "was saved for" suggests a more general act of keeping something for future use. For instance, "The funds "was set aside for" the project" versus "The dessert "was saved for" a special occasion".