Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was served by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was served by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate who provided a service or assistance to someone or something in a past context. Example: "The meal was served by the head chef, who took great pride in his culinary creations."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
What interest was served by this disclosure?
News & Media
But justice was served by the outcome.
News & Media
Lunch was served by a European waiter.
News & Media
That area was served by another center.
News & Media
Neither extreme was served by the staging, which depicted the action at a cinematic remove.
News & Media
From the 18th century the Prussian state was served by a line of distinguished architects.
Encyclopedias
In the United States, ice cream was served by George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Dolley Madison.
Encyclopedias
At midnight, a lavish dinner was served by a gaggle of servants.
News & Media
The meal was served by 250 nuns and priests of the Sisters of Charity order.
News & Media
I know that it was served by candlelight, which created a singular intimacy.
News & Media
It was served by French bailiffs in Paris, where Mr. Randal lives.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was served by" to clearly indicate the entity or individual responsible for providing a service, delivering a result, or facilitating an action in the past. This passive construction emphasizes the recipient of the service and the provider.
Common error
Avoid unnecessarily converting "was served by" into an active voice construction when the emphasis should remain on the recipient of the service. For example, instead of saying "The waiter served the meal", use "The meal was served by the waiter" to focus on the meal and its delivery.
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was served by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received an action performed by someone or something. Ludwig provides examples where it's used to describe how a meal was delivered, an area was provided with resources, or a notice was issued.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Wiki
30%
Science
15%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
10%
Formal & Business
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was served by" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe how a service or action was provided by someone or something. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase frequently appears in neutral to formal contexts, such as news articles, encyclopedias, and scientific publications. While the phrase is generally correct, writers should be mindful of using the passive voice appropriately, ensuring the emphasis remains on the recipient of the service. Alternatives like "was provided by" or "was delivered by" can offer subtle variations in meaning while maintaining clarity and professionalism.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was provided by
Replaces "served" with "provided", emphasizing the act of supplying something.
was delivered by
Substitutes "served" with "delivered", highlighting the act of bringing something to a location or person.
was supplied by
Emphasizes the act of furnishing or equipping something.
was facilitated by
Uses "facilitated" instead of "served", focusing on the act of making something easier or possible.
was carried out by
Replaces "served" with "carried out", focusing on the completion of an action or task.
was attended by
Replaces "served" with "attended", highlighting the service in context of restaurants/service providers.
was rendered by
Uses "rendered" instead of "served", often used in the context of services or performances.
was administered by
Substitute "served" with "administered", highlighting something like justice/medication.
was executed by
Substitutes "served" with "executed", emphasizing the carrying out of a plan or task.
was brought about by
Uses "brought about" instead of "served", highlighting the fact that something was caused or produced.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was served by" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "was provided by" or "was administered by", depending on the context. These options add a layer of professionalism to your writing.
What are some alternatives to "was served by" in a legal context?
In legal writing, you might use phrases like "was executed by" or "was delivered by" to describe how a legal document or process was handled. The best choice depends on the specific action you are describing.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when using "was served by"?
The passive voice is often preferred when using "was served by" because it emphasizes the object or person receiving the service rather than the actor. For instance, "The customer was served by the waiter" focuses on the customer's experience.
How does the meaning change if I use "was serviced by" instead of "was served by"?
While similar, "was serviced by" typically implies maintenance or repair, whereas "was served by" suggests provision of a good or service. For example, a car might be 'serviced' but a customer is 'served'.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested