Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was selected with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was selected with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the criteria or method by which something or someone was chosen or picked. Example: "The candidate was selected with careful consideration of their qualifications and experience."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
A stratified sample of 132 schools was selected with probability of selection proportional to size.
Science
Marshall was selected with the 37th overall selection (the fourth defensive lineman taken) in the 1983 NFL Draft.
Wiki
Then, the best combination of features was selected with a forward feature selection procedure.
Science
Smith was selected with the final pick of the draft's first round last June.
News & Media
The choice of Florida, particularly the politically critical region near Tampa, was selected with a dual purpose in mind.
News & Media
In 1999, he was selected with the third over-all pick in the N.B.A. draft, by the Charlotte Hornets.
News & Media
"I'm a winner," said Walker, who was selected with the ninth pick.
News & Media
Told that Miller had expressed the opinion that the current committee was selected with intended results in mind, Petroskey said, "I don't believe that for a minute".
News & Media
Ms. Sánchez described the contract as a "back-room sweetheart deal" in which "Mr. Ashcroft was selected with no public notice and no bidding".
News & Media
The pot roast of childhood memories, holiday meals and Sunday dinners was selected with care, lovingly rubbed with spices, basted and watched carefully as it cooked for hours.
News & Media
At the age of 19, she was selected with a friend to appear on the cover of the first issue of Petticoat magazine, on 19 February 1966.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
To add variety to your writing, consider using synonyms like "chosen", "picked", or "designated" in place of "selected".
Common error
Avoid using "was selected with" without specifying what it was selected with. For example, instead of saying "The candidate was selected with experience", be precise: "The candidate was selected with at least five years of project management experience."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was selected with" functions as a passive construction indicating the method, criteria, or instrument used in the selection process. Ludwig examples show its versatility in describing selection processes across various contexts, reinforcing its grammatical correctness.
Frequent in
Science
54%
News & Media
37%
Wiki
9%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was selected with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression. As Ludwig AI points out, it is deemed correct and usable in written English. With a frequency of 'very common', it appears extensively in scientific and news-related contexts. The phrase serves to specify the method, criteria, or instrument employed in the selection process. When utilizing this phrase, it is best practice to explicitly state the 'with' element to ensure clarity and avoid vagueness. In essence, "was selected with" offers a versatile and precise way to communicate the nuances of a selection process, adaptable to both formal and informal communication settings.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was chosen using
This alternative focuses on the method or tool employed in the selection.
was picked based on
This alternative highlights the criteria that influenced the selection.
was determined by
This suggests the selection was a direct result of specific factors.
was designated through
Implies a more formal or official selection process.
was appointed according to
Suggests selection based on established guidelines or rules.
was elected via
Highlights a selection process involving voting or election.
was identified through
Focuses on the discovery or recognition of the selected item.
was opted for given
Indicates a preference based on certain conditions or information.
was favored due to
Emphasizes that selection was influenced by specific advantages or qualities.
was handpicked considering
This suggests a careful and deliberate selection, taking specific aspects into account.
FAQs
What can I say instead of "was selected with"?
You can use alternatives like "was chosen using", "was picked based on", or "was determined by" depending on the context.
How to use "was selected with" in a sentence?
"Was selected with" is used to indicate the criteria or method by which something or someone was chosen. For example, "The winner was selected with a random drawing" or "The location was selected with accessibility in mind."
Is it correct to say "was selected by" instead of "was selected with"?
Both "was selected by" and "was selected with" are correct, but they have different meanings. "Was selected by" indicates the person or entity that made the selection, while "was selected with" indicates the criteria or method used for the selection.
Which is more formal, "was selected with" or "was chosen with"?
"Was selected with" generally sounds more formal than "was chosen with". "Selected" is often preferred in formal or professional writing, while "chosen" is more common in everyday language.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested