Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was seen with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was seen with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone was observed in the company of another person or group. Example: "The celebrity was seen with a mysterious figure at the gala last night."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

David Geffen was seen with Cher.

News & Media

The New Yorker

My name was seen with others.

Maximum cholesterol removal was seen with 6 h of treatment.

Significant impairment was seen with the larger dose of ethanol.

Bacterial growth was seen with almost all of them.

The calf was seen with its mother in late August.

A similar effect was seen with "bad" words.

News & Media

The Economist

No staining was seen with GS-2, MPA, or PNA.

The numbers parallel what was seen with brand new medicines.

News & Media

Forbes

Newly formed bone was seen with lighter staining.

The highest correlation was seen with size and shape.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing events or sightings, use "was seen with" to clearly indicate who was observed in the company of whom. This phrasing avoids ambiguity and is readily understood in various contexts.

Common error

Avoid implying a causal relationship simply because someone "was seen with" another person or group. Observation does not equal endorsement or influence. Be sure that the context clearly indicates a relationship beyond mere presence.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was seen with" functions as a passive construction indicating observation. As Ludwig AI points out, it's commonly used to describe someone being observed in the company of another person or group. This usage is supported by the numerous examples provided, showcasing its role in reporting sightings.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

46%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was seen with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to report observations of someone in the company of another. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability, and the provided examples demonstrate its frequent appearance in both scientific and news media. While versatile, it's important to use the phrase accurately, avoiding implications of causation without supporting evidence. Related phrases like "was observed alongside" and "was in the company of" offer similar meanings with slight variations in formality or emphasis. Overall, "was seen with" is a reliable and effective way to convey sightings in a clear and neutral manner.

FAQs

How can I use "was seen with" in a sentence?

Use "was seen with" to describe someone being observed in the company of another. For example: "The celebrity "was seen with" their agent after the awards show".

What are some alternatives to "was seen with"?

Alternatives include "was observed alongside", "was in the company of", or "was spotted together with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was seen by" instead of "was seen with"?

"Was seen by" indicates who did the observing, while "was seen with" indicates who someone was in the company of. For example, "The suspect was seen by the witness" versus "The suspect "was seen with" an accomplice".

How does "was seen with" differ from "was associated with"?

"Was seen with" implies a direct observation of someone in the presence of another, while "was associated with" suggests a connection or relationship that may not involve direct observation. The phrase "was associated with" might imply affiliation rather than simply being present.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: