Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was scaled by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was scaled by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something has been adjusted or modified in size, amount, or degree by a specific factor or entity. Example: "The budget for the project was scaled by the finance department to accommodate new expenses."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
52 human-written examples
Each circle was scaled by 30% from the prior circle.
The self-energy was scaled by a factor 0.8, as described in the text.
Science
Each gauge was scaled by 1 'tick' from the prior gauge.
The image in the left panel was scaled by the software before storing.
Science
As in the smaller system, A was scaled by β in order to explore changes in connectivity strength.
Adult patients were injected with 350 (±10%) MBq of 18F-FDG, and in children, the injected activity was scaled by body weight (weight/70 × 350 MBq).
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
8 human-written examples
The Monument Mountain Reserve, whose peaks were scaled by the likes of Herman Melville and Edith Wharton, is visible from the house, as is the Housatonic River.
News & Media
Denali, first ascended in 1913, is scaled by hundreds of climbers each year.
Encyclopedias
Waveforms are scaled by the same amplitude.
Science
Each row is scaled by Z-score.
Science
These variables are scaled by population.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was scaled by", ensure the scaling factor or method is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "was scaled by a factor of two" rather than simply "was scaled by".
Common error
Avoid using "was scaled by" without specifying the scaling factor. Saying "the image was scaled by the software" is less informative than "the image was scaled by the software to 50% of its original size".
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was scaled by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject has undergone a proportional adjustment or modification. Ludwig examples illustrate its use across various scientific and technical contexts, showing that something receives a transformation based on a specific factor or method.
Frequent in
Science
98%
News & Media
1%
Wiki
1%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was scaled by" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction that signifies a proportional adjustment or modification. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across diverse scientific and technical domains. Primarily found in scientific contexts, it is crucial to clearly define the scaling factor to prevent ambiguity. Alternatives like "was adjusted by" or "was modified by" can be used depending on the intended nuance. As Ludwig examples demonstrate, precision in defining the scaling method enhances clarity and maintains the integrity of the communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was proportioned by
This phrase emphasizes the adjustment of elements to maintain a specific ratio, similar to the scaling concept.
was adjusted by
This alternative suggests a general modification, differing from "was scaled by" which implies a proportional change.
was normalized by
This suggests the query was transformed to a standard range, a specific type of scaling.
was calibrated by
This suggests the query was standardized against a known scale, a more technical meaning than the general scaling.
was standardized by
Indicates a scaling to conform to a standard and makes it a more specific concept of normalizing.
was modified by
Similar to "was adjusted by", this phrase indicates a change but doesn't necessarily imply a proportional adjustment.
was factored by
This indicates that the scale was taken into account, more than simply being adjusted.
was multiplied by
This alternative specifies the mathematical operation of scaling, focusing on the multiplicative aspect.
was divided by
This specifies the opposite mathematical operation of scaling, focusing on division.
was regulated by
Suggests controlled adjustment which is a more restrictive meaning than a general scaling.
FAQs
How can I use "was scaled by" in a sentence?
Use "was scaled by" to describe how a value or object has been adjusted proportionally. For example, "The injected activity "was scaled by" body weight" or "Each circle "was scaled by" 30% from the prior circle".
What does "was scaled by" mean?
"Was scaled by" indicates that something has been adjusted in size, amount, or degree, typically in proportion to something else. It often implies a multiplicative or divisive relationship.
Which is correct, "was scaled by" or "was scaled to"?
"Was scaled by" indicates the factor or method used for scaling, while "was scaled to" indicates the resulting value or size. For example, "The image "was scaled by" a factor of 2" versus "The image "was scaled to" twice its original size".
What are some alternatives to "was scaled by"?
Alternatives include "was adjusted by", "was modified by", "was proportioned by", or "was normalized by", depending on the specific context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested