was resumed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was resumed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that has started again after being stopped for a period of time. Example: After a brief pause, the meeting was resumed.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Co-operation was resumed.

The Economist

Normal business was resumed.

Independent

Normal service was resumed.

The New Yorker

Hauling via horses and mules was resumed.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In 2010, the familiar pattern was resumed.

Independent

"All right," and trade was resumed.

The New Yorker

After a quick fix, service was resumed.

The New York Times

It was resumed 12 years later.

The Guardian

After the war, the recipe was resumed.

The Guardian - Money

The cathedral stood unfinished until 1842, when work was resumed.

Britannica

Work was resumed there in the 20th century.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was resumed" when you want to clearly indicate that an activity, process, or discussion had been interrupted and is now continuing. It adds a sense of formality and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "was resumed" when something has been ongoing without interruption. "Was resumed" specifically denotes a return to something after a pause, unlike "continued" which implies no break.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was resumed" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that an action or process started again after an interruption. This passive construction emphasizes the action itself rather than the actor. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is perfectly correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was resumed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that effectively conveys the restart of an activity after an interruption. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's perfectly correct. Found commonly across diverse contexts like news, science, and encyclopedias, it maintains a neutral formality. Related phrases include "restarted", "continued", and "picked up again". When using "was resumed", ensure it accurately reflects an actual interruption and subsequent continuation, rather than simple ongoing action. This guide offers insights into its usage, alternatives, and common pitfalls, making it a valuable resource for enhancing writing clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

restarted

This emphasizes the beginning again of something, similar to "started again" but slightly more formal.

recommenced

This term offers a more formal and direct synonym, emphasizing the restart of an activity.

continued

A general term for not stopping, applicable to various situations.

started again

This is a simpler, more straightforward way of saying something was resumed.

returned to

This phrase is less direct, referring to a return to a previous state or location.

picked up again

This suggests a continuation of something that was interrupted, with a slightly more casual tone.

took up again

This suggests a deliberate decision to return to a previous activity or task.

reinstated

This implies restoring something to a previous position or condition.

carried on

This implies continuation from a specific point, often used in narrative contexts.

was back on track

This idiom indicates a return to the correct or intended course after a deviation.

FAQs

How can I use "was resumed" in a sentence?

Use "was resumed" to indicate the continuation of an activity after an interruption. For example, "After a brief intermission, the concert "was resumed"."

What are some alternatives to saying "was resumed"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "restarted", "continued", or "picked up again".

Is it correct to say "will be resumed"?

Yes, "will be resumed" is grammatically correct and indicates that something is expected to start again in the future. For example, "The meeting "will be resumed" tomorrow morning."

What's the difference between "was resumed" and "recommenced"?

"Was resumed" implies a return to a previously interrupted state or activity, while "recommenced" simply means to begin again. "Was resumed" emphasizes the interruption, whereas "recommenced" does not.