was restructured

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was restructured" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a process where something has been reorganized or changed in structure, often in a business or organizational context. Example: "The company was restructured to improve efficiency and reduce costs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Management was restructured.

The Economist

The deal was restructured.

The New York Times

Local government was restructured in April 1996.

The Guardian

The company was restructured in 1992.

The New York Times

In the mid-1990s municipal government was restructured.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The athletic department was restructured into four tiers in 1990.

The New York Times - Sports

When Greek debt was restructured, they were hit hard.

The Economist

Nasdaq was restructured and new trading rules were adopted.

The New York Times

Several years ago the library was restructured to do that.

The New York Times

But some of the debt was picked up by Indonesian taxpayers, while around half was restructured.

The Guardian

It was restructured between 1968 and 1971 and by 1974 was back on its feet.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was restructured", ensure the context clearly indicates what entity underwent the restructuring and the purpose or outcome of the change.

Common error

Avoid using "was restructured" without specifying which aspect or part was affected. For example, instead of saying "The department was restructured", specify "The department's management was restructured" for better clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was restructured" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject underwent a process of reorganization. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent use in various contexts. It is typically followed by details specifying what aspects were restructured or the reasons behind the restructuring.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

32%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was restructured" is a commonly used and grammatically sound passive verb phrase indicating a process of reorganization. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears most frequently in news and scientific contexts, with a neutral to professional register. When using this phrase, clarity regarding the subject and scope of restructuring is crucial. Alternatives like "was reorganized" or "underwent reorganization" can be used for variety, but "was restructured" offers a direct and widely understood description of organizational change.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was reorganized

A more straightforward synonym, emphasizing the act of being reorganized.

underwent reorganization

Focuses on the process of reorganizing, implying a systematic change.

was reformed

Suggests an improvement or correction as part of the change.

was revamped

Suggests a significant and often modernizing change.

was overhauled

Suggests a thorough and comprehensive renovation or repair.

was remodeled

Implies a change in the structure or design, often for aesthetic or functional purposes.

was restructured and updated

Combines restructuring with modernization, suggesting both form and content updates.

was reshaped

Emphasizes the alteration of form or shape.

was rebuilt

Indicates a complete reconstruction or rebuilding of something.

was transformed

Implies a significant and dramatic change in nature or appearance.

FAQs

How can I use "was restructured" in a sentence?

Use "was restructured" to describe something that has been reorganized or changed in its fundamental structure. For instance, "The company "was restructured" to improve efficiency".

What can I say instead of "was restructured"?

You can use alternatives like "was reorganized", "was reformed", or "underwent reorganization" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was restructured" or "restructured"?

"Was restructured" is the passive voice, indicating that something received the action of restructuring. "Restructured" on its own would need a subject performing the action. For example, "The manager restructured the team".

What's the difference between "was restructured" and "was renovated"?

"Was restructured" implies a change in the fundamental organization or system, whereas "was renovated" suggests an improvement or update to an existing structure or building, focusing on aesthetics or functionality.