was responded with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was responded with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a response to an action or statement. For example: His request for extra resources was responded with a firm rejection.

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

In 2011, when the official South Park website FAQ was asked whether a sequel would be made, it was responded with "the first South Park movie was so potent, we're all still recovering from the blow.

Wikipedia

Instead, the lawsuit was responded with the addition of a total of 45,000 extra seats that were offered for a limited time to MileyWorld subscribers for the last 21 shows of the Best of Both Worlds Tour.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

He was responding with new vocabulary to what we had said to him.

The Guardian

Once again, the corporation was responding with a conspiracy of silence and intimidation.

The New York Times

Half of each group of subjects was responding with their right hand and the other half with the left.

Brain and Cognition

All the prosecutor's office had to do was respond with their own evidence to rebut it," Konaté said.

The Guardian

Blankfein was responding with legal vs. illegal.

Forbes

He's responded with 12 goals, including two in the 5-0 win over Nelson on Saturday.

The Guardian - Sport

He also said that "any act of aggression will be responded with full force, regardless of its consequences".

The New York Times

The unregister SIP requests are responded with a 200 OK message.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

The Quran teaches Muslims that ignorance should be responded with a greeting of peace (Quran 25:64).

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was responded with", ensure the subject clearly indicates who or what is giving the response. Ambiguity can weaken the sentence's clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "was responded with" excessively, as it can make your writing sound weak and indirect. Active voice constructions often provide more impactful and concise phrasing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was responded with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject received a specific answer or reaction. As Ludwig confirms, it is grammatically correct, but it's important to consider whether an active voice construction would provide greater clarity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Wiki

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was responded with" is a grammatically correct but relatively uncommon passive construction used to describe how someone or something was answered or reacted to. As Ludwig AI confirms, while usable, opting for the active voice can often create a more direct and impactful sentence. The phrase appears in varied contexts, but most frequently in news and media, wikis, and scientific publications. To improve writing, consider alternatives like "answered with" or "replied with" for clearer communication and avoid overusing the passive voice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

met with a response of

Replaces the passive voice with a more active construction.

elicited a response of

Indicates that something caused a particular response.

was answered by

Focuses on the act of answering, rather than the nature of the response.

received the reaction of

Emphasizes the reaction that occurred.

was met by

A simpler and more direct way of saying that something was encountered.

drew a response of

Highlights the act of drawing or attracting a particular response.

prompted a reply of

Suggests that something initiated the response.

resulted in the answer of

Focuses on the outcome of the inquiry or statement.

brought about a retort of

Indicates a quick, sharp, or witty reply.

invoked a reaction of

Implies that something triggered or caused a reaction.

FAQs

How can I make my sentence more active instead of using "was responded with"?

To use a more active voice, restructure the sentence to show who performed the action. For example, instead of "The email was responded with a confirmation", try "They responded to the email with a confirmation" or "The company confirmed receipt by email".

What's a more direct alternative to "was responded with"?

Consider using phrases like "answered with", "replied with", or "reacted with" to create a clearer and more concise statement.

Is "was responded with" grammatically incorrect?

No, the phrase "was responded with" is grammatically sound but can sometimes sound awkward. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. Opt for active voice constructs when possible for better clarity and flow.

When is it appropriate to use "was responded with"?

While grammatically correct, it is preferable to use in contexts where the actor is unknown or unimportant. However, be mindful of potentially passive voice that can weaken the sentence's clarity.