was reported for

USAGE SUMMARY

"was reported for" is a perfectly valid and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to someone having been reported or accused of something. For example: "John was reported for illegally dumping waste into the river."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No figure was reported for digital editions.

The Guardian

Instead, it is understood he was reported for a high elbow on Jarryn Geary.

The Guardian - Sport

This was reported for subarachnoid haemorrhage [39].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Chemical adsorption was reported for mild steel corrosion and physical adsorption was reported for aluminium.

International Journal of Industrial Chemistry

However, a decreased performance was reported for certain aspects.

Construction and Building Materials

Dechlorodehydrogriseofulvin was reported for the first time from nature.

Journal of Chromatography A

Biting behaviour was reported for 15.6% of all dogs.

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

So far, no radiolabelling was reported for CZP.

EJNMMI Research

Disease progression was reported for nine (32.1 %) patients.

Clinical and Translational Medicine

AAPRE of 0.268% was reported for the correlation.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

Funding source was reported for 69 900%) of the publications.

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was reported for", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what made the report and the specific reason for the report. Provide as much detail as possible to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was reported for" without specifying who initiated the report. This can create confusion and weaken the impact of your statement. Instead of "The incident was reported for negligence", specify "The incident was reported by the safety inspector for negligence".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was reported for" functions as a passive construction indicating that someone or something has been formally noted or accused of something. Ludwig AI confirms this usage across a wide range of contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

41%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was reported for" serves as a passive construction, indicating a formal account or notification about someone or something, often implying a negative connotation. Ludwig AI analysis reveals its frequent use in scientific and news contexts, reflecting its neutral register. When writing, ensure clarity by specifying who initiated the report to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "was accused of" or "was investigated for" can provide nuanced meanings, while understanding the difference is key to effective communication. By following these guidelines, you can confidently use "was reported for" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was accused of

This alternative implies a formal charge or accusation, suggesting a more serious situation than merely being reported.

was investigated for

This alternative suggests a formal inquiry or examination into potential wrongdoing, implying a deeper level of scrutiny.

was brought up on charges of

This alternative suggests the initiation of legal proceedings or a formal accusation, implying a severe consequence.

faced allegations of

This alternative emphasizes the presence of unproven claims or accusations, implying a potentially ongoing investigation.

was cited for

This alternative suggests a formal mention or commendation, shifting the context from negative reporting to positive recognition.

was flagged for

This alternative indicates being identified for potential issues or concerns, suggesting a less formal or severe reporting process.

was denounced for

This alternative implies a public condemnation or strong disapproval, highlighting the negative reaction to the actions or situation.

was the subject of a report regarding

This alternative phrase is more formal and emphasizes that the person or thing was the central focus of the report.

was named in a report concerning

This alternative emphasizes that the report mentions the person or entity in relation to a specific issue.

was identified in connection with

This alternative phrase highlights the connection between the person/thing and the subject matter without necessarily assigning blame.

FAQs

How can I use "was reported for" in a sentence?

The phrase "was reported for" is used to indicate that someone or something has been the subject of a formal notification or account. For example, "The employee "was reported for" violating company policy".

What's the difference between "was reported for" and "was accused of"?

"Was reported for" simply means a formal account has been made, whereas "was accused of" implies a specific charge or allegation of wrongdoing. The latter is more serious.

What are some alternatives to "was reported for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "was investigated for", "was flagged for", or "faced allegations of".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was reported for"?

While "was reported for" is passive, it's often appropriate when the reporter is unknown or less important than the subject. However, using active voice (e.g., "The employee reported the incident") can sometimes create a clearer, more direct sentence.