Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was reduced by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was reduced by" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has been lowered or made smaller. For example, "The price of the item was reduced by 10%."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Force was reduced by Ni(2+).
Academia
Recently Blyther's hourly rate was reduced by 25%.
News & Media
The company's debt was reduced by £165m to £1.2bn.
News & Media
After negotiations, the budget was reduced by $1.3 million.
News & Media
Through medication and nutritional advice, this was reduced by 60%.
News & Media
3M's profit was reduced by 7 cents a share.
News & Media
Archer Daniels Midland's fine was reduced by 10percentt.
News & Media
The budget reduction eventually was reduced by half.
News & Media
Inflation was reduced by brutal cuts in the welfare state.
News & Media
Yolande's liver fat was reduced by a third.
News & Media
During his treatment, his sentence was reduced by half.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was reduced by", ensure that the subject being reduced and the agent causing the reduction are clearly identified to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "was reduce by" instead of "was reduced by". Ensure the verb "reduce" is in its past participle form when used in the passive voice.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was reduced by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject underwent a decrease or lessening due to an action or influence. Ludwig examples show its use across numerous contexts, confirming its active role in describing diminishment.
Frequent in
Science
45%
News & Media
36%
Academia
3%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Formal & Business
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was reduced by" is a grammatically correct and very commonly used passive construction that serves to indicate a decrease or lessening. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and wide application across various contexts including science, news, and academia. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the subject being reduced and the agent causing the reduction. Remember to use the correct past participle form ("reduced"). Alternatives like "was decreased by" or "was lowered by" can be used for variety, but "was reduced by" remains a straightforward and effective choice for expressing diminution.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was decreased by
Emphasizes the action of lessening something, but uses a different verb.
was lowered by
Indicates a decrease in height, level, or amount.
was lessened by
Indicates a reduction in severity or intensity.
was diminished by
Suggests a reduction in size, importance, or intensity.
was curtailed by
Implies a restriction or limitation imposed on something.
saw a reduction of
Uses a nominalization, focusing on the reduction as an event.
experienced a decrease of
Similar to 'saw a reduction of', but uses 'decrease'.
declined by
Suggests a gradual decrease, often in quantity or quality.
contracted by
Implies a shrinking or reduction in size or scope.
shrank by
Suggests a decrease in size or amount.
FAQs
How to use "was reduced by" in a sentence?
Use "was reduced by" to indicate that something's value, size, or amount has been lessened. For example, "The company's debt "was reduced by" £165m."
What can I say instead of "was reduced by"?
You can use alternatives such as "was decreased by", "was lowered by", or "was diminished by" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "was reduced by" or "was reduce by"?
"Was reduced by" is the correct phrase. "Reduce" should be in the past participle form (reduced) when used in the passive voice.
What's the difference between "was reduced by" and "saw a reduction of"?
"Was reduced by" is a passive construction indicating direct action, while "saw a reduction of" uses a nominalization, focusing on the reduction as an event or observation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested