was recruited

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recruited" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone was selected or enlisted for a position, role, or organization in the past. Example: "After several interviews, she was recruited by a leading tech company to join their development team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Collins was recruited.

The New York Times - Sports

So Ayoola was recruited.

Independent

Another director, Iain Softley, was recruited.

Independent

I was recruited because I knew German.

The New York Times

He was recruited by the California Angels.

The New York Times

(A volunteer body double was recruited).

The New York Times

"He was recruited by the private sector.

The New York Times

Drummer Dominic Allen, 20, was recruited later.

The Guardian - Arts

He was recruited by Villanova and Michigan State.

The New York Times - Sports

He was recruited back to Sotheby's in 1994.

The New York Times

The force was recruited from the ranks of workingmen.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was recruited" when emphasizing the process of actively seeking and attracting someone to a role, rather than simply filling a position. It's especially suitable when the process involves competition or specialized skills.

Common error

Avoid using "was recruited" in casual conversations where simpler terms like "hired" or "invited" would be more appropriate. Overusing formal language can sound unnatural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recruited" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject underwent the action of being recruited by an external agent. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

5%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was recruited" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that indicates an active process of seeking and selecting an individual or entity for a specific role. Ludwig AI affirms the phrase is correct. It's commonly found in formal contexts such as news, science, and business, emphasizing the deliberate nature of the selection. While versatile, avoid overuse in informal settings where simpler alternatives like "hired" or "selected" might be more appropriate. Knowing when to use "was recruited" helps improve the clarity and impact of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was hired

This alternative focuses on the act of being employed, which is a common outcome of being recruited.

was enlisted

Emphasizes a formal enrollment, often associated with military or structured organizations.

was selected

Highlights the choice made from a pool of candidates, common in competitive environments.

was chosen

Similar to 'selected' but can imply a less formal process of picking someone.

was appointed

Suggests a formal assignment to a position, often by an authority.

was brought on board

An idiomatic expression indicating someone joined a team or project.

was taken on

Similar to 'hired' but can imply a trial or temporary period.

was invited to join

Highlights the aspect of being asked to participate, often in exclusive settings.

was headhunted

Implies that someone was actively sought out for their specific skills or experience.

was scouted

Suggests talent identification, especially in sports or entertainment contexts.

FAQs

How to use "was recruited" in a sentence?

Use "was recruited" to indicate that someone was actively sought and selected for a role or organization. For example: "She "was recruited" by the university due to her expertise in the field."

What can I say instead of "was recruited"?

You can use alternatives like "was hired", "was selected", or "was enlisted" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was recruited" or "got recruited"?

"Was recruited" is generally considered more formal and grammatically correct in written English. "Got recruited" is acceptable in informal speech but less suitable for formal writing.

What's the difference between "was recruited" and "was headhunted"?

"Was recruited" implies a general process of selection, while "was headhunted" suggests that someone was specifically and actively sought out for their unique skills or experience.