was recommenced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recommenced" is not correct in standard English.
The correct term is "was recommenced," which means to begin again or restart something. Example: "The meeting was recommenced after a short break to allow everyone to gather their thoughts."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

Foxtrot was recommenced in the Queens Room, and disco caught a new beat.

The New Yorker

Ten days later, when counting was recommenced, however, Yushchenko's portion rose to 39.87% and Yanukovich's fell to 39.32%.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Antibiotic therapy was recommenced in those patients with pin-track infection.

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

The building of the nave was recommenced in 1485, more than 150 years after it was begun.

Wikipedia

Dialysis was recommenced.

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Valproate was recommenced.

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

Excavations, begun in the 18th century, were recommenced in 1949.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The canal remained inoperative until June 1975, when it was reopened and improvements were recommenced.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Earlier, in 1599, Henry had given orders that the construction of the Pont Neuf should be recommenced but simplified the original plans by discarding the triumphal arches and rows of little houses that had been projected.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Warfarin could be recommenced safely within 24 h following surgery provided adequate haemostasis had been achieved [7].

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

The judge swiftly resigned, triggering calls for the trial of Mr Sayeedi to be recommenced from the beginning.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating that an action or process has begun again after an interruption, prefer using "was restarted" or "was resumed" instead of "was recommenced" for clearer and more standard English.

Common error

Avoid using overly formal or less common verbs like "recommenced" when simpler and more widely understood alternatives such as "restarted" or "resumed" are available. Clarity and conciseness enhance communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recommenced" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that an action, process, or activity was started again by an unspecified actor. However, it's less common than alternatives like "was restarted". Ludwig AI indicates that this term is not correct in standard English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

65%

Encyclopedias

18%

News & Media

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was recommenced" is a passive verb construction indicating that something started again. However, according to Ludwig AI, this term is not correct in standard English. While grammatically valid, it is less common and often considered awkward. The analysis reveals that it appears mainly in scientific and encyclopedic sources. Simpler and more widely accepted alternatives, such as "was restarted" or "was resumed", are generally preferred for improved clarity and broader understanding. Thus, it is advisable to opt for these alternatives in both formal and informal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was restarted

This alternative directly replaces "recommenced" with "restarted", maintaining a similar level of formality and meaning. It is a more common and generally preferred usage.

was resumed

"Resumed" offers a slightly more formal alternative to "restarted", but it is grammatically sound and widely accepted.

recommenced

Omits the auxiliary verb "was", making it an active rather than passive construction. This changes the sentence structure.

had been restarted

Changes the tense to past perfect, indicating the action of restarting happened before another point in the past. It adds a layer of complexity compared to the original.

was initiated again

Uses "initiated again" to convey the concept of starting anew, replacing the single word "recommenced" with a phrase.

was begun anew

Replaces "recommenced" with "begun anew", emphasizing a fresh start.

was started once more

Uses a more descriptive and slightly less formal way to express the idea of restarting.

began again

A simple and direct way to express the action of restarting. Omits the auxiliary verb "was" and changes to an active voice.

picked up again

This is a more idiomatic alternative, suggesting a return to a previously interrupted activity.

carried on again

Suggests a continuation of something after an interruption, similar to "picked up again".

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something started again?

The correct and more common ways to express that something started again are "was restarted" or "was resumed". These options are grammatically sound and widely understood.

Is "was recommenced" grammatically correct?

While "recommence" is a valid verb, the passive construction "was recommenced" is less common and can sound awkward. It's generally better to use "was restarted" or "was resumed".

What can I use instead of "was recommenced" in formal writing?

In formal writing, consider using "was resumed". It maintains a formal tone while being more conventional and easier to understand.

When is it appropriate to use "recommence"?

"Recommence" can be used as an active verb (e.g., "They will recommence the project next week"). However, the passive form "was recommenced" is less frequent and often replaced by "was restarted" or "was resumed".