was received from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'was received from' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate that the subject of the sentence has received something from someone else. For example: We received the documents that were requested from the legal office.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Diethanolamine was received from TCI America.

Nature

Approval was received from FINRA".

TechCrunch

No response was received from Cyprus.

Insights into Imaging

β-Cyclodextrin was received from Himedia chemicals.

Applied Water Science

Written informed consent was received from patients.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

No funding was received from any funder.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

Written consent was received from all participants.

AMB Express

Implied consent was received from all participants.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Written consent was received from each.

ROBOMECH Journal

No financial support was received from SIRTeX and Philips.

EJNMMI Research

Rice husk was received from Krasnodar region (Russia).

Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what received something and from whom or what it was received to maintain clarity.

Common error

Avoid overusing the passive voice with "was received from". Sometimes, an active construction like "X provided Y" is more direct and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was received from" functions as a passive construction indicating the source or origin of something. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

73%

Formal & Business

10%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was received from" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used to indicate the source or origin of something. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and wide applicability. Predominantly found in scientific contexts, it is also present in formal business and news domains. While grammatically correct, writers should avoid overusing the passive voice and consider active constructions for more direct communication. Alternatives such as "was obtained from" or "came from" can offer nuanced meanings depending on the specific context. Using the phrase "was received from" correctly ensures clarity and precision in conveying information about origins and sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was obtained from

Emphasizes the act of getting or acquiring something from a source, often through effort.

was provided by

Highlights the act of someone supplying or furnishing something.

was supplied by

Similar to 'provided by', but can imply a more regular or continuous supply.

was granted by

Indicates that permission or approval was given by an authority.

was awarded by

Suggests a formal recognition or bestowal of something, like a prize or contract.

stemmed from

Implies that something originated or arose from a particular source or cause.

originated from

Directly indicates the source or place where something began.

derived from

Focuses on the process of obtaining or extracting something from a source.

came from

A more general and informal way of saying something originated from a source.

was sourced from

Emphasizes the act of finding or obtaining something from a specific place or supplier.

FAQs

How can I use "was received from" in a sentence?

Use "was received from" to show the origin or source of something. For example, "The grant /s/funding+was+received+from was received from the National Institute of Health".

What are some alternatives to "was received from"?

Depending on the context, consider alternatives like "was obtained from", "was provided by", or "came from".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was received from"?

While "was received from" is grammatically correct, sometimes using active voice (e.g., "donors provided 6.2 million") can make your writing more concise and impactful. Consider your audience and the desired emphasis.

What kind of information usually follows "was received from"?

Typically, the source of something is what follows after. For example, "Feedback /s/feedback+was+received+from was received from 12 health professionals" shows that "12 health professionals" were the source.