was rebuilt

USAGE SUMMARY

"was rebuilt" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing how something was restored or repaired after having been damaged, remodeled, or destroyed. For example, "The school was rebuilt after it burned down in 1992."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Brčko was rebuilt.

The Guardian

Yarl's Wood was rebuilt.

The New York Times

It was rebuilt in the 1990s.

The New York Times

"The movement was rebuilt like Lego pieces".

The New York Times

The facade was rebuilt in 1993.

The New York Times

The great temple of Ptah was rebuilt.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The railway station was rebuilt in 1962.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The fireplace was rebuilt and relined.

The New York Times

The town was rebuilt around the tree.

The New York Times - Style

The bridge was rebuilt after the war.

The Guardian

Each time, it was rebuilt grander than before.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was rebuilt", ensure the context clearly indicates what was damaged or destroyed and why it needed to be rebuilt.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "was rebuilt" in your writing. Sometimes, using the active voice can make your sentences more direct and engaging, for example, "They rebuilt the city after the war."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was rebuilt" functions as the passive voice form of the verb 'rebuild'. It indicates that something underwent the action of being rebuilt by an unspecified or less important agent. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Encyclopedias

22%

Wiki

34%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was rebuilt" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that describes the process of restoring something after damage or destruction. As Ludwig AI highlights, it’s suitable for a wide range of contexts, particularly in news, encyclopedic and wiki-based content. While primarily functioning in the passive voice, understanding its alternatives like "was restored" or "was reconstructed" can help refine your writing. Remember to avoid overuse of the passive voice for more direct and engaging sentences. This phrase is used across various registers, maintaining a neutral tone appropriate for diverse audiences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was reconstructed

Emphasizes the act of building again, often implying a return to a previous state or design.

was restored

Highlights the act of returning something to its original condition, focusing on preservation and repair.

was renovated

Suggests an improvement or modernization during the rebuilding process.

was reconstructed from the ground up

Emphasizes a complete rebuilding, starting from the foundations.

was remodeled

Focuses on altering the structure or form of something during the rebuilding.

was repaired

Highlights the fixing of damage, which may be part of a larger rebuilding process.

was re-established

Emphasizes the act of setting up again or restoring something that was previously in place.

was recreated

Focuses on making something new that replicates a previous design or state.

was refurbished

Implies making something look new again through cleaning, repairing, and redecorating.

was structurally reinforced

Highlights strengthening the core structure of something during the rebuilding process.

FAQs

How can I use "was rebuilt" in a sentence?

You can use "was rebuilt" to describe the process of restoring or reconstructing something after it has been damaged or destroyed. For example, "The bridge "was rebuilt" after the earthquake".

What can I say instead of "was rebuilt"?

Alternatives to "was rebuilt" include "was restored", "was reconstructed", or "was renovated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "was rebuilt" or "rebuilt"?

The choice between "was rebuilt" (passive voice) and "rebuilt" (active voice) depends on the context. "Was rebuilt" emphasizes the object that underwent reconstruction, while "rebuilt" highlights the agent doing the rebuilding. For instance, "The city "was rebuilt" by the community" versus "The community rebuilt the city".

What's the difference between "was rebuilt" and "was repaired"?

"Was rebuilt" suggests a more extensive reconstruction, often involving significant structural changes or a complete replacement. "Was repaired", on the other hand, implies fixing specific damages without necessarily altering the overall structure. A building "was repaired" after minor damage, while it "was rebuilt" after a major fire.