Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was rebuffed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was rebuffed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a situation in which someone was denied or rejected. For example: "The proposal was rebuffed by the city council."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The G.A.O. was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

The request was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

The man was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

But he was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was rebuffed.

News & Media

The Economist

He was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

He was rebuffed as well.

News & Media

The New York Times

Often, he was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Repeatedly, he was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

He said he was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Each time, he was rebuffed.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was rebuffed" when you want to emphasize a direct and somewhat abrupt rejection of a proposal, request, or advance. It's stronger than simply "rejected".

Common error

Avoid using "was rebuffed" to describe situations where something was merely delayed or postponed. "Rebuff" implies a firm rejection, not a temporary setback.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

Was rebuffed functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject of the sentence experienced a rejection. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in describing denial or rejection as shown in the examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

82%

Encyclopedias

6%

Science

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was rebuffed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase indicating a direct rejection. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for describing situations where an offer, request, or advance is denied, often abruptly. While the phrase carries a neutral to slightly formal tone, it is prominently featured in news and media contexts, as well as encyclopedic entries. When aiming for alternatives, consider options like "was rejected" or "was turned down" to either maintain formality or adopt a more informal tone. Be mindful to reserve "was rebuffed" for genuine rejections rather than delays or postponements.

FAQs

What does "was rebuffed" mean?

The phrase "was rebuffed" means that someone's offer, suggestion, or advance was rejected in a direct and often abrupt manner.

How can I use "was rebuffed" in a sentence?

Example: "The company's takeover bid "was rebuffed" by the board of directors."

What are some alternatives to saying "was rebuffed"?

You can use alternatives such as "was rejected", "was turned down", or "was refused" depending on the context.

Is "was rebuffed" formal or informal?

"Was rebuffed" has a neutral to slightly formal tone and is suitable for use in news articles, reports, and professional communication.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: