was priced at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was priced at" is appropriate and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when referring to the cost of a product, service, or experience. For example, "This vacation package was priced at $2,000 for the five-day trip."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

(It was priced at about fifty dollars).

The New Yorker

That car was priced at $54,605.

The New York Times

The piece was priced at £1m ($1.44m).

The Guardian

My hot dog was priced at three dollars.

The New Yorker

The Clinton plan was priced at $60 billion.

The New York Times - Science

Mrs. Buchanan's house was priced at $260,000.

The New York Times

The basic Altair 8800 was priced at $397.

The New York Times

The Schick Hydro "Silk," its purple sibling, was priced at $18.49.

Independent

The stock was priced at $16, at the bottom of the company's expectations.

The New York Times

A nice alcove studio, with more than 500 square feet, was priced at $487,500.

The New York Times

When the Kindle was introduced in late 2007, it was priced at $399.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always double-check pricing figures for accuracy, especially in formal reports or news articles. Verify the source of your information to maintain credibility.

Common error

Avoid stating a price without specifying what it includes. For example, instead of saying "The service was priced at 100", specify "The service was priced at $100 per month, including maintenance."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was priced at" functions as a verb phrase indicating the assigned monetary value to a product, service, or asset. It is commonly used to report or state the cost of something, as seen in the examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Wiki

23%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Science

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was priced at" is a commonly used verb phrase to indicate the cost or valuation of a product, service, or asset. According to Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and suitable for various writing contexts. This phrase is most frequently found in news and media sources, as well as in encyclopedic or wiki-based content. While neutral in register, the phrase effectively communicates factual pricing information. To ensure clarity, it's best practice to specify the currency and context of the pricing. Common errors include providing incomplete pricing information, which can lead to ambiguity. Alternatives such as "retailed for" or "sold for" may be used depending on the specific context. Ludwig's AI indicates the phrase is appropriate and widely applicable in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sold for

Indicates the final selling price of an item.

retailed for

Focuses on the price at which something was sold to the consumer.

was listed at

Highlights the listed or advertised price.

was marked at

Highlights the price that was visibly indicated on a product.

carried a price tag of

Emphasizes the price that was attached to an item.

was valued at

Focuses on the assessed monetary worth.

had an asking price of

Specifies the initial price requested by the seller.

cost

A more concise way of expressing the price, lacking the passive voice.

fetched a price of

Indicates the price that was obtained for something, often in an auction or sale.

had a valuation of

Emphasizes the assessed value rather than the selling price.

FAQs

How can I use "was priced at" in a sentence?

The phrase "was priced at" is used to indicate the cost of something. For example, "The new model car "was priced at" $30,000." It specifies the price that was set for a product or service.

What are some alternatives to "was priced at"?

Alternatives include "retailed for", "sold for", "carried a price tag of", and "was valued at". The choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was priced at" or should I use another phrase?

"Was priced at" is grammatically correct and commonly used. However, depending on the context, phrases like "cost", "sold for", or "had an asking price of" might be more appropriate. The key is to choose the phrase that best fits the situation.

What is the difference between "was priced at" and "was valued at"?

"Was priced at" refers to the selling price or the cost at which something is offered for sale. "Was valued at", on the other hand, indicates an estimated or assessed worth, which might differ from the actual selling price. For example, an antique "was valued at" $10,000 but "sold for" $8,000.