was previously removed

USAGE SUMMARY

"was previously removed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in any context when discussing something that has been removed in the past, such as a document or a piece of equipment. For example: "The top shelf of the bookcase was previously removed, but we put it back in place."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

The image was previously removed by Google on the grounds that the site hosting the Michelle Obama picture "violated Google's guidelines by serving malware to visitors," SearchEngineLand writes.

Huffington Post

Moore is no stranger to federal/state confrontation, as he was previously removed from office as the state's chief justice in 2003, when he refused to remove a stone monument to the Ten Commandments from the Alabama Judicial Building.

Huffington Post

"Garcia-Chavez was previously removed to Mexico Dec. 9, 2014 and illegally re-entered the United States, making him a Priority 2 ICE enforcement priority according to the Nov. 20, 2014 Department of Homeland Security memo".

Vice

Zona pellucidae of embryos was previously removed by treatment in 0.5% pronase solution.

BMC Genomics

To determine to what extent the age factors contribute to the variation in "2nd-log obs/exp", regression lines (calculated between age and the "2nd – log obs/exp" for each probe – data not shown) were used to eliminate the effects of age from the "2nd-log-obs/exp" in the same way in which the influence of proteasome expression level was previously removed.

Biology Direct

Cover the baby back up in their rubber pant that was previously removed from their body.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Of those, 180 were either convicted criminals, had been issued a final order of removal or had been previously removed from the U.S. and returned illegally.

Los Angeles Times

After the removal of SNPs that overlapped the windows which were previously removed from the analysis because they contained Ns, repeats, or organelle DNA, 10,685 SNPs remained.

BMC Genomics

The statement said the agency's priority targets are "criminal aliens, illegal reentrants (in other words, persons who have been previously removed and illegally reentered the country), and those persons with outstanding orders of removal".

Vice

Neural crest tissue was excised and transferred to a recipient embryo where the neural crest tissue had been previously removed (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 2h).

Nature

A spokesperson for ICE said that many of the Karnes residents who had spent more than six months in detention already had been previously removed from the US and had re-entered illegally for a second time.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was previously removed", ensure the context clearly indicates what was removed and the reason behind its removal for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "was previously removed" without specifying what was removed, as this can confuse the reader. Always provide a clear subject to maintain clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was previously removed" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject underwent an action of removal at an earlier time. This is supported by Ludwig's examples demonstrating its use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was previously removed" is a grammatically sound and useful construction in English, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to indicate that something has been taken away or eliminated before a specified time. While not exceedingly common, its usage spans across diverse fields such as science, news, and general reference. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly stating what was removed and why, avoiding ambiguity. Ludwig examples show that it's critical to provide a clear context. Alternatives such as "had been taken away before" and "was earlier detached" can be considered for stylistic variation, keeping in mind their nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had been taken away before

Uses "taken away" to replace "removed", emphasizing the action of taking something away. It is slightly more informal.

was earlier detached

Replaces "previously removed" with "earlier detached", focusing on separation or disconnection at an earlier time.

had been eliminated beforehand

Substitutes "removed" with "eliminated", indicating a complete removal, and "previously" with "beforehand".

was formerly taken out

Replaces "previously removed" with "formerly taken out", implying a removal that occurred in the past.

was detached in the past

Replaces "previously removed" with "detached in the past", focusing on disconnection during an earlier time.

was separated before

Uses "separated" instead of "removed", emphasizing the act of setting apart or dividing something at an earlier time.

had been extracted earlier

Replaces "removed" with "extracted", which indicates that something has been pulled out.

was cut off before

Uses "cut off" to replace "removed", emphasizing the action of cutting something away.

had been withdrawn before

Replaces "removed" with "withdrawn", indicating the act of taking something back or away.

was rescinded earlier

Substitutes "removed" with "rescinded", which implies that something has been cancelled or revoked.

FAQs

How can I use "was previously removed" in a sentence?

You can use "was previously removed" to indicate that something has been taken away or eliminated before a specific point in time. For example, "The statue "was previously removed" due to safety concerns."

What can I say instead of "was previously removed"?

You can use alternatives like "had been taken away before", "was earlier detached", or "had been eliminated beforehand" depending on the context.

Is "was previously removed" grammatically correct?

Yes, "was previously removed" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard passive voice construction and is widely used in formal and informal writing. Ludwig AI confirms this.

What's the difference between "was previously removed" and "was recently removed"?

"Was previously removed" indicates that the removal happened at some point in the past, while "was recently removed" specifies that the removal occurred not long ago.