Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was possibly

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was possibly" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you are suggesting something might have been true or have happened in the past. For example: "The stranger we passed by on the street was possibly the thief we had heard about."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

The sight was possibly Phoenician".

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was possibly a great song.

News & Media

The New Yorker

This was possibly a futile hope.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Chelsea's fate was possibly preordained.

News & Media

The New York Times

But Godot was possibly a greater influence.

News & Media

The Guardian

There was, possibly, some good news here.

That was possibly even clearer than James's.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

The fear is possibly exaggerated.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Help is possibly days away.

News & Media

The New York Times

They are possibly carcinogenic.

The answer is "possibly".

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was possibly" to indicate a degree of uncertainty about a past event or state. It is suitable when you want to suggest a possibility without making a definitive claim.

Common error

Avoid overusing "was possibly" in formal writing where a more assertive tone is expected. Instead, consider using phrases like "it is likely that" or "it is probable that" for greater impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was possibly" functions as an adverbial modifier expressing uncertainty or possibility regarding a past state or event. It softens a statement, suggesting that something may have been the case without asserting it definitively. Ludwig confirms the correct usage of this expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was possibly" serves as an adverbial modifier that indicates uncertainty or possibility concerning a past event or state. It's grammatically correct and frequently used, as confirmed by Ludwig, particularly in News & Media and Scientific contexts. While versatile, it's essential to avoid overuse in formal writing where a more definitive tone is preferable. Related phrases include "might have been" and "could have been". The choice between "was possibly" and alternatives like "was probably" depends on the degree of certainty you wish to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "was possibly" in a sentence?

Use "was possibly" to express uncertainty about a past event or situation. For example, "The delay "was possibly" due to unforeseen circumstances".

What are some alternatives to "was possibly"?

Alternatives include "might have been", "could have been", or "may have been", depending on the context and the degree of uncertainty you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "was possibly" in formal writing?

Yes, "was possibly" is grammatically correct, but consider using stronger alternatives like "it is likely that" or "it is probable that" in formal contexts to convey more certainty.

What's the difference between "was possibly" and "was probably"?

"Was possibly" indicates a lower degree of certainty than "was probably". The latter suggests a higher likelihood based on available evidence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: