was poorly received

USAGE SUMMARY

"was poorly received" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when something has had a negative response or reception. For example, "The new album was poorly received by the critics."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The film was poorly received and has an 11% "rotten" rating at Rotten Tomatoes.

Wikipedia

"Human Nature" was poorly received.

The New York Times

But their first product configuration was poorly received by clinicians.

Stanford University

It was poorly received and attended, he conceded.

The New York Times

The work of Bolyai and of Lobachevsky was poorly received.

Britannica

In our research, this approach was poorly received by customers.

Harvard Business Review

Much to Eakins's disappointment, "The Gross Clinic" was poorly received.

The New York Times - Health

It was poorly received when it was published (H.

The New Yorker

"Barcarole", a huge success in Germany, was poorly received abroad.

The Economist

The show was poorly received by viewers in early January.

The New York Times - Arts

By all accounts, the performance was poorly received.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was poorly received", ensure that the context clearly indicates who or what did the receiving (e.g., critics, audiences, customers).

Common error

Avoid using "was poorly received" without a clear subject. It's crucial to specify by whom something was poorly received to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was poorly received" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that the subject of the sentence experienced a negative reception, implying a lack of approval or enthusiasm from the audience or critics. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Wiki

25%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Science

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was poorly received" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase that effectively communicates a negative reception. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Its prevalence across news media, encyclopedias, and wiki sources highlights its versatility in expressing disapproval or lack of enthusiasm. To ensure clarity, it's essential to specify who or what did the receiving. Alternative phrases like ""met with a negative reaction"" and ""failed to impress"" can add nuance to your writing while conveying the same core meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

met with a negative reaction

Replaces 'poorly received' with a more direct description of the response.

failed to impress

Focuses on the lack of positive impact or effect.

was met with disapproval

Highlights the disapproval aspect of the reception.

did not resonate with

Indicates a lack of connection or positive emotional response.

was given a thumbs down

Uses an idiomatic expression for negative feedback.

elicited a lukewarm response

Describes a response that lacks enthusiasm or warmth.

was considered unfavorable

Emphasizes the negative assessment of something.

did not gain acceptance

Focuses on the failure to be accepted or embraced.

was viewed negatively

Highlights the negative perspective or viewpoint.

suffered a setback

Indicates a negative consequence or impediment.

FAQs

What does "was poorly received" mean?

The phrase "was poorly received" means that something was not liked or approved of by the people who experienced it, such as critics, audiences, or the general public.

How to use "was poorly received" in a sentence?

You can use "was poorly received" to describe the reception of a movie, book, product, or idea. For example, "The new film "was poorly received" by critics but became a cult classic with audiences".

What can I say instead of "was poorly received"?

You can use alternatives like "met with a negative reaction", "failed to impress", or "was met with disapproval", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was poorly received" or "was badly received"?

Both "was poorly received" and "was badly received" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. However, "was poorly received" might be considered slightly more formal and common in certain contexts.