was particularly striking

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was particularly striking" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that stands out or has a strong impact in a specific context, such as art, literature, or personal experiences. Example: "The sunset over the mountains was particularly striking, with vibrant colors painting the sky."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

The casino was particularly striking.

The New York Times

One letter was particularly striking.

The New York Times - Books

Batarfi's account of Osama's American trip was particularly striking.

The New Yorker

Joanna Trollope, the chair of judges, said the breadth of subject matter was particularly striking.

The Guardian - Books

The reluctance was particularly striking at Stenger, an office-supply store in downtown Frankfurt.

The New York Times

Jane was particularly striking, and her character development and understandable thoughts were poignant throughout the book.

The Guardian

The outcome in Washington, where more than a hundred delegates were at stake, was particularly striking.

The New Yorker

Mr. Salaam's lilting, sensuous choreography for the women was particularly striking, as was the staging.

The New York Times - Arts

Against this volatile backdrop, the defense offered in the case in Nancy was particularly striking.

The New York Times

And Hirotaka Matsuo, the principal cellist, was particularly striking in the score's prominent solo passages.

The New York Times - Arts

Their swift response was particularly striking because they had never seen a live snake.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the audience and adjust the tone accordingly. While the phrase is suitable for various contexts, formal settings may benefit from more sophisticated synonyms such as "notably conspicuous" or "exceptionally significant".

Common error

Avoid using "was particularly striking" as a generic descriptor without providing concrete details. Instead of simply stating that something was striking, elaborate on the elements or aspects that contributed to its prominence or impact. This enhances the clarity and persuasiveness of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was particularly striking" functions as a subject complement, providing additional information about the subject. It serves to emphasize a notable quality or characteristic. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is considered correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

41%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was particularly striking" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to emphasize notable qualities or features. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It finds frequent application in News & Media and Scientific contexts, while remaining suitable for both formal and informal communication. When using this phrase, be specific about what makes the subject stand out to maximize impact. Common alternatives include "was especially notable" and "was remarkably impressive". Avoid generic usage by always providing concrete details.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was especially notable

Replaces "striking" with "notable", indicating something worthy of attention or easily noticed.

was remarkably impressive

Substitutes "particularly striking" with "remarkably impressive", focusing on the quality of inspiring admiration or respect.

was exceptionally significant

Emphasizes the importance of something to a degree beyond the ordinary, using "exceptionally significant" instead of "particularly striking".

stood out considerably

Focuses on the aspect of prominence, indicating something was noticeably different or better.

was notably conspicuous

Highlights the easiness to notice or observe something, employing "notably conspicuous" in place of "particularly striking".

was prominently evident

Stresses the clarity and obviousness of something, making it easily seen or understood.

was unusually remarkable

Replaces "striking" with "remarkable", emphasizing that something deserves attention because it is special or unusual.

was outstandingly salient

Emphasizes how something stands out and is relevant, using "outstandingly salient" instead of "particularly striking".

was uniquely exceptional

Highlights the distinctiveness and superiority of something, indicating it's beyond ordinary.

was singularly impressive

Stresses that something made a strong positive impression, with a unique or individual quality.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "was particularly striking" in a sentence?

To effectively use "was particularly striking", follow it with a specific explanation of what made the subject noticeable. For example, "The artist's use of color "was particularly striking" because it created a strong emotional response" is more impactful than "The art "was particularly striking"."

What are some formal alternatives to "was particularly striking"?

In formal writing, you might consider alternatives like "was exceptionally significant", "was remarkably impressive", or "stood out considerably" to maintain a sophisticated tone. These options convey a similar meaning while aligning with the elevated register of formal contexts.

Is it okay to use "was particularly striking" in academic writing?

Yes, it is acceptable, but be sure to follow it with a detailed explanation. For example, "The correlation between these variables "was particularly striking", suggesting a need for further investigation" is a suitable usage in academic writing.

How does "was particularly striking" differ from "was very striking"?

"Was particularly striking" implies a more specific and analyzed observation, suggesting that the striking nature was noted after careful consideration. "Was very striking" is a more general and immediate observation. The phrase including "particularly" requires specific and analyzed support, whereas "was very striking" does not.