was originally published

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was originally published" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate the initial release or publication date of a work, such as a book, article, or study. Example: "The novel was originally published in 1995, gaining popularity over the years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This story was originally published by Glassdoor.

Independent

The book was originally published in 2004.

The New York Times

It was originally published anonymously.

The Guardian - Business

This story was originally published on ForbesTraveler.com.

Forbes

This post was originally published on Atrium.

TechCrunch

This piece was originally published in October.

TechCrunch

This article was originally published Nov. 27.

Los Angeles Times

This article was originally published at noon.

Los Angeles Times

This post was originally published Jan . 5

Los Angeles Times

This post was originally published Oct.

Los Angeles Times

This story was originally published 10 35 a.m.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was originally published", consider adding the specific date for clarity. For example, "This article was originally published on January 1, 2020."

Common error

Avoid stating "was originally published" if you are referring to the current publication or release date. This phrase is for indicating a past, initial publication date.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was originally published" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a piece of content underwent the action of being published at an earlier time. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is grammatically correct and primarily used to provide context about a source's history.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was originally published" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, mainly within the realm of news and media. Its primary function is to provide historical context about the initial release of a work, aiding readers in understanding its origins. While alternatives like "was initially released" exist, this phrase remains a clear and direct way to indicate prior publication. To maximize clarity, it’s advisable to include the specific date of original publication. It's important not to confuse this with the current publication date, ensuring accurate conveyance of information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was initially released

Focuses on the first release, rather than specifically the publication aspect.

was first issued

Highlights the act of issuing something for the first time, which could include publication.

first appeared in

Indicates where the work was first seen or made available.

was initially printed

Specifically refers to the printing of a physical copy, less applicable to digital publications.

saw its initial publication

A more formal way of saying the work was initially published.

was formerly released

Uses "formerly" to specify a previous release, rather than the very first one.

was previously issued

Similar to "formerly released", indicating a past issuance.

debuted in

Highlights the first public appearance or presentation of the work.

was at first circulated

Emphasizes the initial distribution of the work.

originated as

Focuses on the origin or initial form of the work.

FAQs

How can I use "was originally published" in a sentence?

You can use "was originally published" to indicate the initial release date of an article, book, or other work. For example, "This article "was originally published" in The New York Times in 2005".

What is a good alternative to "was originally published"?

Some alternatives include "was initially released", "first appeared in", or "was previously issued", depending on the context.

Is it necessary to include the original publication date when using "was originally published"?

While not always required, including the original publication date provides greater context and transparency for your readers.

What's the difference between "was originally published" and "was republished"?

"Was originally published" refers to the first time a work was released, while "was republished" indicates that a work has been published again at a later date.