was of little consequence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was of little consequence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not important or does not have a significant impact on a situation. Example: "Although the meeting was lengthy, the topics discussed were of little consequence to the overall project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

Strategically, it was of little consequence.

The New Yorker

Weigel apologized for his error as well, even though his tweet was of little consequence.

The New Yorker

At the time orchids were considered to be so abundant it was of little consequence.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The weapon of surprise was lost, although against the Greeks it was of little consequence.

The New York Times - Sports

The veteran landed the first punch of the contest, but his left to the chest was of little consequence.

The Guardian - Sport

However, one of the daughters must marry very well, and love in marriage was of little consequence in those days.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

The rule anyway is of little consequence.

The Economist

Individually, these things are of little consequence.

The Guardian

WILL SMITH That is of little consequence.

The Guardian - Film

That turns out to be of little consequence.

MIT Technology Review

Besides, a lot of the closeups are of little consequence.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was of little consequence" when you want to downplay the importance of something, indicating it had a minimal impact on the overall situation. Ensure the context clearly shows why the subject is considered insignificant.

Common error

Avoid using "was of little consequence" when the subject actually had a noticeable or significant effect. Ensure your assessment of insignificance is accurate and supported by evidence to avoid misleading your audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was of little consequence" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, modifying a noun or clause by ascribing to it a state of insignificance. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and provides examples from diverse sources.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Academia

16%

Science

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6%

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was of little consequence" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote insignificance or minimal impact. Ludwig AI's analysis highlights its correctness, as well as its presence in various sources, including News & Media and Academia. The phrase functions as a predicative adjective, serving to downplay the importance of something. When using the phrase, ensure the context supports the assessment of insignificance and consider alternatives like "held minimal importance" or "proved insignificant" for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was of minor importance

Swaps "consequence" for "importance" and elevates level of formality.

held minimal importance

Replaces "consequence" with "importance" and uses "minimal" instead of "little", slightly altering the emphasis.

proved insignificant

Changes the structure to a more direct statement of insignificance, using "proved" to indicate a discovered lack of importance.

had negligible impact

Substitutes "consequence" with "impact" and "little" with "negligible", indicating a very small effect.

mattered very little

Simplifies the phrase to a more informal expression of unimportance, using "mattered" to convey significance.

was essentially irrelevant

Uses "irrelevant" to express a lack of connection or importance to the situation.

was not particularly important

Rephrases using a more explicit negation of importance, adding "particularly" for emphasis.

carried no weight

Uses a metaphorical expression to indicate a lack of influence or significance.

didn't make much difference

Presents a more conversational way to express that something had little effect.

had no real effect

Focuses on the lack of a tangible result or outcome, using "effect" instead of "consequence".

FAQs

How can I use "was of little consequence" in a sentence?

Use "was of little consequence" to indicate that something had a minimal impact or was not important in a particular situation. For example, "Although the team lost a point, it "was of little consequence" to the final score."

What can I say instead of "was of little consequence"?

You can use alternatives like "held minimal importance", "proved insignificant", or "had negligible impact" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was of little consequence" or "was of no consequence"?

"Was of little consequence" suggests a minimal impact, while "was of no consequence" implies absolutely no impact. The choice depends on the degree of insignificance you wish to convey.

What's the difference between "was of little consequence" and "was not significant"?

"Was of little consequence" is a more formal way of saying something "was not significant". The former emphasizes the lack of impact, while the latter simply states a lack of importance.