Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was observed with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was observed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are describing something that was noticed by someone. Example: The strange creature was observed with its strange behavior by the scientists.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

NGC 3256 was observed with ACIS as a GO observation (PI Ward).

The cell morphology was observed with an inverted microscope.

Science & Research

Nature

No impingement was observed with NRG.

Circumstance was observed with a 21-gun salute, but pomp was restrained.

News & Media

The New York Times

But Memorial Day was observed with more than parades and old war movies on cable channels.

News & Media

The New York Times

No additional risk was observed with placing blocks under general anesthesia.

A similar improvement was observed with LNF 100 mg BID + PEG-IFNα 180 μg QW.

Substantial agreement was observed with the experiment results.

No cross-reaction was observed with other similar viruses.

High specificity was observed with no detectable cross-reactions.

Infiltration of leucocytes was observed with the 40 mg dose.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was observed with", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is doing the observing. This passive construction is most effective when the observer is implied or less important than the observation itself.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by ensuring the reader can easily infer who or what made the observation. If the observer is important, consider rephrasing in the active voice to make it explicit.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was observed with" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something was noted or detected in conjunction with something else. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

Academia

20%

News & Media

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was observed with" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to describe observations or findings, especially in scientific and academic contexts. According to Ludwig AI, it's suitable for indicating that something was noted or detected alongside something else. While the phrase is widely accepted, ensure clarity by making sure the observer is easily understood, and consider using active voice for emphasis. Related phrases include "was detected alongside" and "was seen in association with", offering alternative ways to convey similar meanings.

FAQs

How can I use "was observed with" in a sentence?

Use "was observed with" to describe a situation where something was noted or detected alongside something else. For example, "A similar trend "was observed with" MCP."

What are some alternatives to "was observed with"?

You can use alternatives like "was detected alongside", "was noticed together with", or "was seen in association with" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "observe"?

Whether to use active or passive voice depends on the context. Use active voice when you want to emphasize the observer, and passive voice (e.g., "was observed with") when the observation itself is more important or the observer is implied.

What does "was observed with" imply about the relationship between two things?

"Was observed with" implies that two things were present or occurred together, but it doesn't necessarily indicate a causal relationship. Further analysis might be needed to establish causation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: