was noted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was noted for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something is recognized or acknowledged for a particular quality, achievement, or characteristic. Example: "The author was noted for her innovative storytelling techniques that captivated readers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Sister Sweeney was noted for her financial acumen.

The New York Times

John was noted for his lifelong dedication to physical fitness.

The New York Times

He was noted for his extraordinary dark room skills.

The New York Times

The kingdom was noted for its gold and diamonds.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Lewis also was noted for promoting jazz among younger performers.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Thirteenth-century dress was noted for its plainness.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Liston was noted for his punching power and durability.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A linear approach was noted for each measure.

Behaviour Research and Therapy

Some discrepancy however, was noted for the tetra-alkylammonium salts.

Electrochimica Acta

A BPR was noted for 29 cares (32%).

Annals of Intensive Care

Displacement was noted for all the principle directions.

Progress in Orthodontics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was noted for" when you want to highlight a specific quality or achievement that is widely acknowledged but not necessarily universally known. It's effective for emphasizing particular attributes within a broader context.

Common error

Avoid using "was noted for" repeatedly in formal documents. Vary your phrasing with alternatives like "was recognized for", "was known for", or "excelled in" to maintain reader engagement and avoid sounding monotonous.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was noted for" functions as a descriptive verbal phrase, indicating that a subject is recognized or acknowledged for a particular attribute, quality, or accomplishment. Ludwig provides numerous examples across diverse contexts illustrating its widespread use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

32%

Wiki

27%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was noted for" is a grammatically sound and versatile construction used to highlight specific attributes or achievements. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and provides a wide range of examples across diverse fields. While suitable for various contexts, including science, news, and general writing, varying the phrasing with alternatives can enhance writing quality. Its consistent usage and clear communicative function make it a valuable addition to any writer's toolkit. The analysis reveals that it is most frequently found in scientific and encyclopedic content.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was recognized for

This alternative uses "recognized" instead of "noted", emphasizing acknowledgement.

was known for

This alternative uses "known" suggesting widespread awareness.

was distinguished by

This alternative highlights a unique or exceptional quality.

was celebrated for

This alternative emphasizes a positive and public acknowledgement.

was famed for

This alternative implies a wide reputation, often bordering on legendary.

was remarkable for

This alternative stresses the unusual and noteworthy nature of the trait.

was prominent for

This alternative emphasizes the notability and importance of a specific feature.

was remarkable due to

This alternative uses "remarkable due to" emphasizing that something is unusual or worth noticing because of something.

gained recognition for

This alternative focuses on the process of becoming recognized.

garnered acclaim for

This alternative suggests receiving praise and approval.

FAQs

How can I use "was noted for" in a sentence?

Use "was noted for" to highlight a specific quality, skill, or characteristic for which someone or something is known. For example, "She was noted for her innovative research in genetics."

What can I say instead of "was noted for"?

You can use alternatives like "was recognized for", "was known for", or "was distinguished by" depending on the context.

Is "was noted for" formal or informal?

"Was noted for" is generally suitable for both formal and informal contexts. However, in very formal writing, you might consider alternatives like "was recognized for" to enhance the professional tone.

What's the difference between "was noted for" and "was known for"?

"Was known for" implies widespread knowledge or awareness, whereas "was noted for" suggests that something has been specifically observed or recognized, possibly by a particular group or in a specific context. While similar, "was known for" carries a broader implication than "was noted for".