was not unusual

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not unusual" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was common or expected in a particular context. Example: "The weather in this region during the summer was not unusual, with temperatures often reaching above 90 degrees."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That was not unusual.

The New York Times

He was not unusual.

Independent

This was not unusual.

The New York Times - Sports

But that was not unusual.

The New York Times

That experience was not unusual.

Independent

This case was not unusual.

The New York Times

Her slow maturation was not unusual.

The New Yorker

This was not unusual at Walmart.

The New Yorker

The situation in Baikalsk was not unusual.

The New York Times

The Chapins' situation was not unusual.

The New York Times

Her experience was not unusual.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not unusual" to effectively convey that a situation, event, or characteristic was typical or to be expected within a given context. It can soften potentially negative implications by suggesting that the situation was normal.

Common error

While "was not unusual" is perfectly acceptable, overuse in formal writing can make your prose sound repetitive. Vary your language by employing synonyms such as "was quite typical" or "was fairly common" to maintain reader engagement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not unusual" functions as a descriptive statement, indicating that a particular event, situation, or characteristic was typical or expected within a given context. As noted by Ludwig AI, it's a grammatically correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Encyclopedias

13%

Science

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not unusual" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that conveys the typicality or expectedness of a given situation. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread usage. Predominantly found in news and media, it serves to normalize events and mitigate surprise. While versatile, varying your language by employing synonyms is advisable, particularly in formal writing. This ensures a richer, more engaging prose while maintaining clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was quite typical

Replaces "unusual" with "typical", offering a direct synonym.

was fairly common

Substitutes "unusual" with "common", indicating frequent occurrence.

was to be expected

Emphasizes the predictability of the event or situation.

was nothing out of the ordinary

Highlights the lack of exceptional or surprising elements.

was a regular occurrence

Focuses on the repeated nature of the event.

was a standard practice

Indicates that the action or behavior was generally accepted and followed.

was the norm

Short and direct, implying that the situation was typical.

was within the realm of possibility

Suggests that the event was plausible and foreseeable.

did not raise eyebrows

Emphasizes the lack of surprise or concern caused by the event.

fit the pattern

Implies that the event aligned with established trends or behaviors.

FAQs

How can I use "was not unusual" in a sentence?

You can use "was not unusual" to describe something that was typical or expected. For example, "The high number of tourists during the summer "was not unusual" for the coastal town".

What are some alternatives to "was not unusual"?

Some alternatives to "was not unusual" include "was quite typical", "was fairly common", or "was to be expected". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is "was not unusual" the same as "was unusual"?

No, "was not unusual" means that something was typical or expected, while "was unusual" means that something was atypical or unexpected. They have opposite meanings.

When is it appropriate to use "was not unusual" in writing?

It is appropriate to use "was not unusual" in writing when you want to convey that a situation, event, or characteristic was within the realm of what is considered normal or expected. It's suitable for both formal and informal contexts, though alternatives may be preferable in very formal settings.