was not tested

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not tested" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has not undergone a testing process or evaluation. Example: "The new software feature was not tested before the release, leading to several unexpected issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This recipe was not tested in the Times' Test Kitchen.

Los Angeles Times

This recipe was not tested in The Times Test Kitchen.

Los Angeles Times

Africa was not tested.

The New York Times

The apple was not tested for cyanide.

The Guardian - Books

Whether the findings would apply to women was not tested.

The Washington Post

The Villarreal goalkeeper was not tested again before the interval.

The Guardian - Sport

Brad Friedel was not tested, but David de Gea too was not tested enough considering Tottenham's superiority.

The Guardian - Sport

It was not tested in a "gas spectrometer".

The New York Times

The fatty image set was not tested.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

However, this assumption was not tested.

Insights into Imaging

Influence of adverse events other than vomiting was not tested.

Health Economics Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not tested", be specific about what aspect or component was not tested to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "The product was not tested", specify "The product's safety features were not tested."

Common error

Avoid using "was not tested" as a blanket statement without providing context. Saying something "was not tested" without specifying the parameters or criteria can render the statement meaningless and uninformative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not tested" primarily functions as a declarative statement indicating the absence of a testing process. Ludwig's examples show it used across various domains to convey that something did not undergo evaluation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

27%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not tested" is a versatile expression used to indicate that something has not undergone a testing process. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and widely used across various fields, especially in science and news reporting. While grammatically correct, it's important to provide context about what specific aspects were not tested to ensure clarity. Alternatives like "was not evaluated" or "remained unverified" can be used for stylistic variation. The phrase conveys a lack of evaluation and potentially raises concerns about reliability or validity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not evaluated

This phrase replaces "tested" with "evaluated", indicating a broader assessment was absent.

never assessed

This alternative is more concise to say that there was no assessment at all.

was not validated

This indicates the absence of confirmation or proof of accuracy.

did not undergo assessment

This formally states that no assessment process occurred.

remained unverified

This alternative uses a single word to convey the lack of confirmation, offering a more concise option.

lacked validation

This focuses on the absence of verification, suggesting a need for confirmation.

was left unexamined

This suggests a lack of scrutiny or investigation, focusing on a detailed inspection.

was not subjected to scrutiny

This highlights the absence of critical examination, adding emphasis to the rigor lacking.

was unexplored

This conveys that the topic or item in question wasn't investigated at all.

had no trial

This refers to the absence of an experimental test.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was not tested" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "was not evaluated", "was not validated", or "did not undergo assessment".

What does it imply when something "was not tested"?

It generally implies that the subject in question hasn't been checked, examined, or verified for a particular purpose or set of criteria. This can raise concerns about its reliability, safety, or effectiveness.

Is it better to say "was not tested" or "has not been tested"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "was not tested" implies the testing did not occur at a specific time in the past, while "has not been tested" suggests the testing has not occurred up to the present moment and may still be a possibility.

What are some synonyms for "was not tested" in a scientific context?

In a scientific context, you might use "remained unverified", "was unexplored", or "lacked validation" to convey that a hypothesis, sample, or method did not undergo experimentation or verification.