was not supported

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not supported" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something did not receive backing, endorsement, or assistance in a particular context. Example: "The proposal was not supported by the majority of the committee members, leading to its rejection."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The Piedraiaceae was not supported, but resolves in the Teratosphaeriaceae.

Studies in Mycology

His claim was not supported by other Hamas officials.

The Guardian

"The headline was not supported by the text.

The Guardian

In fact, live online play was not supported.

The Guardian - Tech

But that belief was not supported by this study.

The New York Times

His account was not supported by other officials, however.

The New York Times

That suggestion was not supported by the article.

The New York Times

Russia said the 1.5C limit was not supported by science.

The Guardian

Perhaps the first version was not supported by the facts?

The New York Times

H1b was not supported.

Fashion and Textiles

Therefore, H4 was not supported.

International Journal of Quality Innovation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not supported", ensure the context clearly identifies what or who did not provide the support. Providing this information enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was not supported" without specifying the reason. A vague statement lacks informative value. Instead, provide context: "The hypothesis was not supported due to insufficient data."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not supported" functions as a passive construction indicating the absence of backing, endorsement, or validation. As evidenced by Ludwig AI, this phrase is commonly used to express that a claim, hypothesis, or idea lacked sufficient evidence or approval.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

35%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not supported" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to indicate a lack of endorsement, validation, or assistance. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears frequently in scientific, news, and formal contexts. While versatile, it's important to provide context regarding what or who did not provide support to avoid vagueness. Alternative phrases such as "lacked evidence" or "was rejected" can offer nuanced meanings depending on the situation. By understanding these aspects, writers can effectively employ "was not supported" to convey precise information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacked evidence

Emphasizes a deficiency in proof or substantiation, shifting focus to the absence of supporting data.

did not hold up

Suggests a failure to withstand scrutiny or testing, highlighting the invalidity of a claim or idea.

was refuted

Indicates a direct contradiction or disproof, placing emphasis on the act of being disproven.

was disproved

Highlights that something has been proven false, emphasizing the definitive nature of the rejection.

failed to gain traction

Focuses on the lack of popularity or acceptance of an idea or proposal, shifting attention to its inability to spread.

did not receive approval

Highlights the absence of official sanction or authorization, emphasizing the formal rejection of something.

did not find favor

Emphasizes a lack of positive reception or liking, focusing on the subjective disapproval of something.

was rejected

Indicates a formal refusal or dismissal, highlighting the act of being turned down.

met with disapproval

Highlights the negative reception or dissatisfaction encountered, focusing on the expression of disagreement.

did not stand up to scrutiny

Emphasizes the inability to withstand detailed examination or analysis, highlighting the weaknesses of something.

FAQs

How can I use "was not supported" in a sentence?

The phrase "was not supported" indicates a lack of endorsement, validation, or assistance. For example: "The claim "was not supported" by evidence."

What are some alternatives to "was not supported"?

You can use alternatives such as "lacked evidence", "was rejected", or "failed to gain traction" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was not supported by" or "did not support"?

The choice depends on the sentence structure. "Was not supported by" indicates a passive construction where something received no support. "Did not support" is active, indicating someone or something actively withheld support.

What does it mean when a hypothesis "was not supported"?

In scientific research, if a hypothesis "was not supported", it means the data collected during the study did not confirm the hypothesis, and it may need revision or rejection.