was not secured

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not secured" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was not made safe, protected, or guaranteed in a particular context. Example: "The building was not secured after hours, leading to potential safety risks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

43 human-written examples

Mr. Esposito's safety harness was not secured.

The New York Times

Even so, the succession was not secured.

The Guardian

The crime scene was not secured.

The Guardian - Travel

Still, the victory was not secured until the buzzer.

The New York Times - Sports

The victory was not secured until Kyrie Irving missed a 3-pointer at the buzzer.

The New York Times - Sports

His greatest legacy, Ireland's membership in the EEC, was not secured until 1973, after his death.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

17 human-written examples

"Their loan is not secured," he said.

BBC

Look, our border is not secured.

Huffington Post

McCain added: "Look, our border is not secured.

Huffington Post

"If funding is not secured now, the consequences will be grave," it added.

Los Angeles Times

"Privacy is not secured here, and it is really difficult to breast-feed my child".

Unicef

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "was not secured", ensure that the context clearly indicates what should have been secured and the potential consequences of its lack of security.

Common error

Avoid using "was not secured" when an active voice construction would be more direct and clear. For example, instead of "The door was not secured by the guard", consider "The guard did not secure the door".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not secured" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an action to make something safe or protected was not performed. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability in written English. It's often used to highlight a failure in security measures.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Wiki

19%

Science

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was not secured" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that indicates a lack of safety or protection. As noted by Ludwig AI, it's a useful construction for highlighting security failures in various contexts, with news media being the most frequent source. When writing, be mindful of choosing between active and passive voice for clarity. Alternative phrases like "was unsecured" or "was not guaranteed" can add nuance, depending on the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was unsecured

This alternative directly replaces "secured" with its antonym, maintaining a very similar meaning and grammatical structure.

was unprotected

This focuses on the lack of protection, emphasizing vulnerability.

was unfastened

This suggests a physical lack of attachment or closure.

was not guaranteed

This shifts the focus to a lack of assurance or certainty.

was not ensured

Similar to "was not guaranteed", this emphasizes the absence of a guarantee.

was left exposed

This highlights the vulnerability and lack of cover.

was at risk

This emphasizes the presence of danger due to the lack of security.

was vulnerable

This directly states the susceptibility to harm or attack.

did not secure

This is an active voice version of the query, it focuses on the action of securing something that was not done.

failed to secure

This emphasizes the failure to provide security.

FAQs

How can I use "was not secured" in a sentence?

The phrase "was not secured" indicates a lack of safety or protection. For example, "The crime scene "was not secured", allowing potential evidence to be compromised."

What's a formal alternative to "was not secured"?

In formal contexts, consider using "was not guaranteed" or "was not ensured". For example, "Their safety "was not guaranteed" during the evacuation process."

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was not secured"?

While "was not secured" is grammatically correct in passive voice, active voice constructions like "did not secure" can sometimes be clearer and more direct. Consider the context to determine the most effective phrasing.

What does it mean when something "was not secured"?

It means that something lacked the necessary measures to ensure its safety, protection, or stability. Depending on the context, this could refer to physical security, financial security, or any other type of security.