was not replicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not replicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something was not duplicated or reproduced, often in scientific or experimental discussions. Example: "The results of the experiment were promising, but unfortunately, they were not replicated in subsequent trials."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Or rather, it was not replicated.

The Guardian - Arts

Rather, the scale of infrastructure at Bolton in October 2014 was not replicated by on-field output.

The Guardian - Sport

A Home Office report on the data noted that the "sharp increase" in hate crime was not replicated in equivalent offences at the time.

The Guardian

The Yandex boss described the criticism of Facebook by Google's Brin as "an American story, like two matadors" that was not replicated in the Russian internet market.

The Guardian - Tech

Groupon's big fourth quarter was not replicated.

TechCrunch

However this finding was not replicated and thought to be a result of interaction with cigarette smoking [35].

Clinical and Translational Medicine

However, the REM dream-lag effect was not replicated here, possibly due to design differences from previous studies.

Consciousness and Cognition

On the other hand, the significance of 29 (24%) markers was not replicated in at least one study.

Advances in Clinical Chemistry

This result was not replicated in a subsequent study on different European and African groups [22].

Plosone

This finding was not replicated in analyses that examined the relationship between these same exposures and S. aureus nasal colonization.

Plosone

A reported difference in suprachiasmatic nucleus between homosexual and heterosexual men [18] was not replicated by others.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not replicated", clearly state what was expected to be replicated and the context in which it failed to do so. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was not replicated" without specifying the conditions or parameters under which the replication was attempted. Lack of context can render the statement meaningless.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not replicated" functions as a declarative statement, indicating that a previous result or finding could not be reproduced or duplicated. This phrase is commonly used to report on the reliability and validity of research outcomes. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and frequent usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

18%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not replicated" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that a previous finding or result could not be reproduced, mainly in scientific and news contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is widespread and considered accurate. Related phrases include "was not reproduced" and "could not be replicated". When using this phrase, it is crucial to provide specific context about what was expected to be replicated to avoid ambiguity. Common errors involve overgeneralization without specifying the experimental conditions. Given its prevalence and authoritative usage, understanding the nuances of "was not replicated" is essential for effective communication in academic and professional settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not reproduced

This alternative focuses on the act of reproducing something, emphasizing the lack of duplication.

was not duplicated

This alternative highlights the absence of an exact copy or instance.

could not be replicated

This emphasizes the inability or impossibility of replicating something.

was not confirmed

This alternative suggests that the original findings lacked verification or validation.

was not validated

This implies a failure to prove or support the original claim or result.

was not substantiated

This suggests the original findings lacked adequate evidence or support.

did not reproduce

This is a more concise way of saying that something did not yield the same results.

failed to replicate

This alternative directly states the failure of replication.

was not borne out

This emphasizes that the original findings were not supported by subsequent evidence.

did not hold up

This indicates that something did not remain valid or consistent over time or across different contexts.

FAQs

What does "was not replicated" mean in research?

In research, "was not replicated" means that a study's findings could not be reproduced in subsequent experiments or studies, suggesting the original results might be questionable or not generalizable.

What are some alternatives to "was not replicated"?

You can use alternatives like "was not reproduced", "could not be replicated", or "was not confirmed" depending on the specific context.

How do I use "was not replicated" in a sentence?

Here's an example: "The initial study showed promising results, but the effect "was not replicated" in a larger sample."

What does it mean if a research finding "did not hold up" compared to "was not replicated"?

"Did not hold up" suggests the finding lost validity over time or in different conditions. "Was not replicated" specifically means the finding couldn't be reproduced in a separate, similar experiment.