was not replaced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not replaced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something remained unchanged or was not substituted for another item or entity. Example: "The old software was not replaced, as it still meets our needs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She was not replaced.

The New York Times

He was not replaced.

The New York Times

It suggested the receiver was not replaced properly.

The Guardian - Money

Today it has 18. (One teacher left and was not replaced).

The New York Times

He was not replaced, Mr. Gerrish said, and financing for the position had been withdrawn.

The New York Times

When she retired in 2009, this support ended and was not replaced.

The Guardian

The stock in the store dwindled and it was not replaced as business was bad.

The New Yorker

The ambassador, Burton Levin, retired in September 1990 and was not replaced; he was not withdrawn.

The New York Times

The steeple was not replaced during the reconstruction in the early 1970s.

The New York Times

It was not replaced by a substantially different theory until the mid-1950s.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Joseph Yun, the U.S. Special Representative for North Korea Policy, quit at the end of February and was not replaced.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not replaced", ensure the context clearly indicates what the subject is and why it not being replaced is significant. For instance, in a business context, specify if a departing employee "was not replaced" due to budget constraints or restructuring.

Common error

Avoid stringing together multiple passive constructions with "was not replaced", as it can make your writing sound convoluted. Instead, consider rephrasing the sentence to use an active voice or a more direct construction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not replaced" primarily functions as a passive construction indicating the absence of substitution or replacement. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples where the phrase is used to describe situations where a person, object, or system was removed and not succeeded by another.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Wiki

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not replaced" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that something or someone removed, lost, or terminated was not substituted by another. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase appears frequently across diverse sources, including news media, scientific publications, and encyclopedias. The phrase's neutral register and clear meaning make it suitable for both formal and informal communication. While the phrase is widely accepted, it's important to use it judiciously, avoiding overuse and ensuring clarity in the context. Alternatives like "was not substituted" or "remained in place" can offer nuanced variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not substituted

Indicates a direct lack of substitution, maintaining a formal tone.

was not superseded

Suggests that something older was not replaced by something newer or more advanced.

was not exchanged

Focuses on the absence of a swapping action between two entities.

remained in place

Emphasizes the continuation of something without intervention.

was not updated

Highlights the absence of an upgrade or modernization.

was not filled

Used when referring to a position or role that remained vacant.

was left untouched

Implies that something was deliberately or inadvertently left unchanged.

was not restored

Suggests a previous state or item was not brought back.

was not replicated

Indicates the original was not copied.

was not duplicated

Focuses on the fact that one entity was not created starting from another.

FAQs

What does "was not replaced" mean?

The phrase "was not replaced" indicates that something or someone that was removed, lost, or terminated was not substituted by another thing or person. The previous state remains unfulfilled or vacant.

How can I use "was not replaced" in a sentence?

You can use "was not replaced" to explain that an item or person was removed and nothing took its place. Example: "After the employee resigned, their position "was not replaced" due to budget cuts."

What are some alternatives to "was not replaced"?

Some alternatives include phrases like "was not substituted", "remained in place", or "was left untouched" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was not replaced" or "remained unchanged"?

Whether to use "was not replaced" or "remained unchanged" depends on the nuance you want to convey. "Was not replaced" implies a removal and a subsequent lack of substitution, while "remained unchanged" suggests that no alteration occurred.