was not recognised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not recognised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something or someone did not receive acknowledgment or identification. Example: "Despite her efforts, her contributions to the project were not recognised by the management."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Kline admits the importance was not recognised at the time.

The Guardian - Tech

The full extent of this link was not recognised in the guidelines set out in 1995.

The Guardian

He became bitter that he was not recognised or financially compensated for his discovery.

The Guardian

Because the family's vulnerability was not recognised the endless attacks were not linked.

The Guardian

A slight teenager in a baseball cap for a moment was not recognised.

The Guardian

But Best was not recognised as one of our best straight away.

The Guardian

Chegeni was deemed to be stateless because he was not recognised as a citizen by Iran.

The Guardian

Kabyle was not recognised as a national language in Algeria until 2002.

The Guardian - Sport

The Hamas win was not recognised, nor was the national unity government formed.

The Guardian - Opinion

Turkmenistan Declared independence in October 1991, but was not recognised as independent until December.

Independent

A 1992 referendum held in the region was not recognised as valid by most countries.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not recognised", ensure the context clearly indicates what or who failed to be acknowledged or identified. Providing specific details enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by explicitly stating the subject that "was not recognised". For instance, instead of "The issue was not recognised", specify "The severity of the problem was not recognised".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not recognised" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone or something did not receive acknowledgment or identification. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

18%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not recognised" is a grammatically sound and commonly used passive construction that indicates a lack of acknowledgment or identification. Ludwig AI validates its usability across a range of contexts. While suitable for neutral registers, its specific tone can shift based on the overall context. Remember to ensure clarity by explicitly stating the subject that failed to be recognised. This phrase frequently appears in news and media, science, and wiki sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not acknowledged

Indicates a lack of formal or public acceptance or admission.

was not identified

Emphasizes a failure to pinpoint or determine the nature of something.

was not accepted

Focuses on the lack of approval or agreement.

was not validated

Highlights the absence of confirmation or proof.

was not appreciated

Implies a lack of gratitude or understanding of value.

went unnoticed

Suggests a lack of observation or attention.

was overlooked

Indicates that something was missed or disregarded.

was disregarded

Suggests a deliberate act of ignoring or dismissing.

was not registered

Focuses on the absence of official recording or listing.

was not understood

Emphasizes a lack of comprehension or grasp of meaning.

FAQs

How can I use "was not recognised" in a sentence?

Use "was not recognised" to indicate a lack of acknowledgment or identification. For example, "His talent "was not recognised" until later in his career".

What are some alternatives to "was not recognised"?

You can use alternatives such as "was not acknowledged", "was not identified", or "was overlooked" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "was not recognised" or "was not recognized"?

"Was not recognised" is the British English spelling, while "was not recognized" is the American English spelling. Choose the spelling that aligns with your target audience.

What's the difference between "was not recognised" and "went unnoticed"?

"Was not recognised" implies a failure to acknowledge or identify something, while "went unnoticed" suggests something was simply not observed or given attention.