was not permanent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not permanent" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that was temporary or not lasting in nature. Example: "The changes made to the schedule were not permanent, allowing for adjustments in the future."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Their reunion was not permanent.

The New Yorker

But the McVeigh stigma around the Patriots was not permanent.

The New Yorker

"It's a nuisance because it's really needed," he said, adding that the damage was "not permanent".

The New York Times - Arts

But she pointed out that the digital version was not permanent.

The New York Times

This kingdom, however long it was destined to endure, was not permanent.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Mr. Flammini said he knew his job here was not permanent.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

But the condition wasn't permanent.

The New York Times

"It's not permanent.

The New York Times

"This trail is not permanent.

The New York Times - Travel

"That you're not permanent.

The New York Times

"This is not permanent," Kresse says.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not permanent" to clearly indicate that a situation, condition, or solution is expected to change or expire. This sets appropriate expectations and avoids confusion.

Common error

Avoid stating something "was not permanent" if the context heavily implies it should be. This can create unnecessary uncertainty. Instead, focus on why it's temporary and what the expected outcome is.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not permanent" functions as a descriptive statement indicating that a particular condition, situation, or characteristic is temporary and not intended to last indefinitely. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

34%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not permanent" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe something temporary or not lasting. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. It's frequently found in News & Media and Scientific sources, indicating a neutral register suitable for various contexts. When using this phrase, ensure you set clear expectations about the expected changes or outcomes. Consider alternatives like ""was temporary"" or ""was not lasting"" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was temporary

Replaces "permanent" with its direct antonym, indicating a short-lived duration.

was not lasting

Emphasizes the lack of endurance or long-term effect.

was impermanent

Uses a more formal synonym for "not permanent".

was short-lived

Highlights the brevity of the duration.

was transient

Uses a more formal term to suggest a fleeting or quickly passing nature.

was provisional

Indicates a conditional or interim arrangement.

did not endure

Focuses on the failure to last or withstand time.

was not indefinite

Specifies that the duration had a known or expected end.

was mutable

Suggests that the state was subject to change.

was alterable

Highlights that the state or condition could be changed.

FAQs

How can I use "was not permanent" in a sentence?

You can use "was not permanent" to describe temporary conditions or solutions. For example: "The agreement "was not permanent", and would need to be renegotiated after a year".

What are some alternatives to "was not permanent"?

Alternatives include "was temporary", "was transient", or "was not lasting". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired nuance.

Is it better to say "was temporary" or "was not permanent"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and often interchangeable. "Was temporary" is more direct, while "was not permanent" might be used to soften the impact or emphasize the lack of long-term stability.

What does it mean when something "was not permanent"?

It means that the condition, situation, or solution is expected to change or end at some point in the future. It implies a lack of long-term stability or durability.