was not modified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not modified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something remained unchanged or unaltered. Example: "The original document was not modified during the review process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In situ degradation was not modified by level of intake.

Livestock Production Science

Platelet aggregation was not modified by either treatment.

Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Spain's agrarian economic structure also was not modified.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The fee structure for broker-dealers, however, was not modified in the final plan.

Columbia University

And the script was not modified to prevent Mr. Gandolfini's character from remarking, "I had my own gang" once.

The New York Times

All other peaks increased as well, but the number of compounds present was not modified (data not shown).

Nature

Digestibility of organic matter and fibre was not modified by intake and breed.

Livestock Production Science

Except for EC, observed variability was not modified by the land uses.

CATENA

Locomotor activity of mice was not modified by compound 7 or 10 at the doses tested.

Biochemical Pharmacology

On the other hand, serotonin content was not modified in the median eminence.

Toxicology Letters

The C14:1/C14:0 Δ9–desaturase index was not modified by CSFA.

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not modified", ensure the context clearly indicates what could have potentially changed it. This adds clarity and impact to your statement.

Common error

Avoid assuming the audience understands what aspects were potentially subject to change. Explicitly state the expected or possible alterations to avoid ambiguity when using "was not modified".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not modified" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something did not undergo changes. Ludwig AI confirms this usage is grammatically correct and commonly employed across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

16%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not modified" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that something has remained unchanged. Ludwig AI shows that it is frequently used in scientific, academic, and news contexts. Alternative phrases like "remained unchanged" or "was not altered" can be used to convey similar meanings, depending on the specific nuance required. When using "was not modified", ensure to clearly specify the scope of potential changes to avoid ambiguity. This makes the use of the phrase clearer and more impactful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

remained unchanged

Focuses on the continuation of the same state without alteration.

stayed the same

Emphasizes the lack of change over a period.

was not altered

Highlights that no alteration occurred, emphasizing a direct action that didn't happen.

was not changed

Simple and direct, indicating that no change took place.

was preserved

Suggests that measures were taken to maintain its original state.

was kept intact

Implies that it remained whole and undamaged.

was maintained

Indicates active effort to keep it in its current condition.

held constant

Suggests a controlled environment where no variation was allowed.

experienced no alteration

Formally states that no alteration happened.

underwent no modification

A more formal and technical way of saying that it was not changed.

FAQs

How can I use "was not modified" in a sentence?

Use "was not modified" to indicate that something remained unchanged. For instance, "The original code "was not modified" during the update".

What are some alternatives to "was not modified"?

Alternatives include "remained unchanged", "stayed the same", or "was not altered", depending on the specific context and desired nuance.

Is it better to say "was not modified" or "remained as is"?

"Was not modified" explicitly states that there was a potential for change that didn't occur, while "remained as is" simply indicates that the state persisted. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the absence of change or just the continuity of state.

What's the difference between "was not modified" and "was not changed"?

While similar, "was not modified" often implies a more formal or technical context compared to "was not changed". "Was not modified" might be preferred when discussing documents, code, or processes, while "was not changed" is suitable for more general contexts.