was not listed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not listed" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is commonly used in the passive voice to indicate that something was not included or mentioned. Here are two examples: 1. "The item you requested was not listed in the catalog." 2. "Her name was not listed on the guest list, so she was denied entry to the event."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Her name was not listed.

The New York Times - Sports

This year it was not listed.

The New Yorker

The Orchid-flowered dahlia was not listed.

Stanford University

His death was not listed as suicide.

The New York Times

And if a food was not listed?

The New York Times

His home telephone was not listed.

The New York Times

No. 99 was not listed on the rosters.

The New York Times - Sports

Saw palmetto was not listed on the report.

The New York Times

The drug, bumetanide, was not listed on the product label.

The New York Times

The drug, bumetanide, was not listed on the product's label.

The New York Times - Sports

Smoke inhalation was not listed as a factor.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not listed", ensure the context clearly indicates the list or record from which something is absent. For instance, specify "was not listed on the menu" or "was not listed in the database."

Common error

Avoid using "was not listed" without specifying where it was expected to be listed. The statement becomes unclear if the implied list or source is ambiguous.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not listed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject did not appear on a particular list. As shown by Ludwig, this phrase is widely used to denote the absence of something from a roster, record, or database.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

27%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not listed" is a grammatically sound and very common passive construction used to indicate the absence of something from a list or record. According to Ludwig, it appears frequently in various contexts, including news, scientific publications, and academic writings. While versatile, it's essential to specify the list or source to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "was not included" and "did not appear" can provide stylistic variations while retaining the core meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was unlisted

Highlights the state of something not being included on a list.

was not included

Emphasizes the act of excluding something from a collection or group, often intentionally.

was omitted

Suggests that something was left out, either intentionally or unintentionally.

did not appear

Focuses on the absence of something from a visual or recorded representation, implying that it should have been there but isn't.

was excluded

Implies a deliberate act of keeping something out, often due to a specific reason or criterion.

was absent from the record

Highlights the absence from an official or documented account, suggesting a formal omission.

was not registered

Specifically refers to the absence of something from a formal registration process.

failed to appear

Indicates that something was expected to be present but wasn't.

was not found

Emphasizes the inability to locate something during a search or review.

was missing from the inventory

Specifically indicates absence from a list of items that constitute an inventory.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was not listed" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "was absent from the record" or "was not included in the official documentation".

What does "was not listed" imply?

The phrase "was not listed" implies that something or someone was expected to be on a particular list or record, but it was not found there. It can suggest omission, exclusion, or simply a failure to register or document something.

Is there a difference between "was not listed" and "was not included"?

While similar, "was not listed" typically refers to absence from a specific enumeration or register, whereas "was not included" suggests a broader exclusion from a group or set.

How to use "was not listed" in a sentence?

Example usage: "Although she applied for the scholarship, her name "was not listed" among the recipients."