was not in question

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not in question" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not being doubted or is certain in a discussion or argument. Example: "The integrity of the research was not in question, as it was backed by extensive data and peer reviews."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

That was not in question.

The New York Times

That Coco O could sing was not in question.

The New York Times - Arts

His membership of the party was not in question".

The Guardian

Her nationality last night, however, was not in question.

The Guardian - Sport

Yet it also said the European nation's solvency was "not in question".

The New York Times

As far as I was concerned, my fertility was not in question.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

The sincerity of Muhammed's conviction about the treatment of apostates wasn't in question.

Vice

His competence is not in question.

The New Yorker

His identity is not in question.

The New York Times

His own integrity is not in question.

The Economist

Hill's guilt is not in question.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not in question" to emphasize that a particular aspect of a situation is certain and agreed upon. This can strengthen your argument by highlighting established facts.

Common error

Avoid using "was not in question" in very informal or casual settings where simpler language would be more appropriate. For example, in a casual conversation, you might say "everyone knew that" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not in question" functions as a declarative statement affirming the certainty or lack of doubt regarding a specific aspect or attribute. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which indicates correct and usable English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

72%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not in question" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to affirm the certainty of a fact or attribute. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s correct and usable in various contexts. Predominantly found in news and media, as well as scientific writing, it helps establish clarity and confidence by removing potential doubt. When aiming for simpler language or casual conversation, consider alternatives like "was certain" or "was undisputed". Proper use ensures you strengthen your argument by emphasizing agreed-upon elements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was beyond doubt

Emphasizes the certainty and lack of any doubt surrounding something.

was without doubt

Highlights the absence of any uncertainty or reservation.

was not doubted

Directly states that no one questioned or doubted something.

was undisputed

Indicates that something was accepted by everyone without any challenge.

was not up for debate

Suggests that something was not open to discussion or argument.

was a certainty

Conveys that something was definitely going to happen or was definitely true.

was taken as a given

Implies that something was assumed to be true without any need for proof.

was generally accepted

Indicates that the majority of people agreed with or believed something.

was beyond dispute

Highlights that there was no room for disagreement or contention.

was already established

Suggests that something had been proven or confirmed previously.

FAQs

How can I use "was not in question" in a sentence?

Use "was not in question" to state that something wasn't doubted or disputed. For example, "His dedication to the project "was not in question"; he consistently worked overtime."

What are some alternatives to "was not in question"?

Some alternatives include "was undisputed", "was certain", "was beyond doubt", or "was taken as a given", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "was not in question" or "was not in doubt"?

Both "was not in question" and "was not in doubt" are grammatically correct. "Was not in question" emphasizes that something wasn't challenged, while "was not in doubt" highlights the lack of uncertainty.

What's the difference between "was not in question" and "was not an issue"?

"Was not in question" means something was certain or undisputed. "Was not an issue" means something didn't cause problems or concern. For example, "His competence "was not in question"", but "Funding "was not an issue"".