was not hurt

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not hurt" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone did not sustain any injury or damage in a particular situation. Example: "Despite the car accident, thankfully, he was not hurt."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(He was not hurt).

The New Yorker

Brown was not hurt.

The New York Times

She was not hurt.

The New York Times

Barry was not hurt.

The New York Times

I was not hurt badly.

The New York Times

Talbot was not hurt.

The New York Times

Hilliard was not hurt.

The New York Times - Sports

The commissioner was not hurt.

The New York Times

Ms. Grande was not hurt.

The New York Times

Mr. Wolfowitz was not hurt.

The New York Times

Brandon Fischer was not hurt.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not hurt" to clearly and concisely convey that someone did not sustain any physical injuries in an incident. It's particularly effective in news reports and personal narratives where clarity is essential.

Common error

Avoid using "was not hurted" or other grammatically incorrect forms. The correct past participle of "hurt" is "hurt".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not hurt" functions as a declarative statement indicating that someone or something did not experience physical injury or harm. Ludwig examples show this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

4%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not hurt" is a common and grammatically sound way to express the absence of injury or harm following an event. Ludwig's AI confirms its correctness and usability across various contexts, particularly in news and media, specifically sports reporting. While several alternative phrases exist, such as "sustained no injuries" or "remained unharmed", "was not hurt" provides a clear and concise means of conveying this information. It is essential to maintain correct tense usage and avoid ungrammatical forms. With its neutral register and widespread use, "was not hurt" is a valuable phrase for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

remained unharmed

Focuses on the lack of any harm, often in situations with potential danger.

sustained no injuries

Emphasizes the absence of physical injuries.

escaped injury

Highlights the act of avoiding injury, often by luck or circumstance.

came through unscathed

Implies surviving a dangerous situation without any damage.

walked away unharmed

Suggests a fortunate escape from a potentially harmful situation.

was uninjured

A more formal way of stating that someone did not suffer any injuries.

suffered no harm

Highlights the absence of any kind of harm, physical or otherwise.

did not sustain any injuries

A more verbose way to express the absence of physical injuries.

was none the worse for wear

Indicates that someone is unaffected by a potentially damaging experience.

avoided injury

Focuses on the action of preventing an injury from occurring.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was not hurt" in a formal context?

In formal contexts, you can use phrases like "sustained no injuries" or "remained unharmed" to convey a similar meaning with a more professional tone.

What's a more casual way to say "was not hurt"?

Informally, you might say "walked away unharmed" or "came through unscathed" to indicate that someone avoided injury.

Is there a difference between "was not hurt" and "was not injured"?

While similar, "was not hurt" is generally broader and can refer to emotional or physical harm, while "was not injured" specifically refers to physical injuries.

How to use "was not hurt" in a sentence?

You can use "was not hurt" to indicate the absence of injury after an event, such as, "Despite the car accident, he "was not hurt"."