was not evident

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not evident" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was unclear or not obvious in a particular context. Example: "Despite the extensive research, the results of the experiment were not evident to the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Clear evidence of publication bias was not evident (P=0.94).

British Medical Journal

That immaculate Dior polish was not evident.

The New York Times

However, this was not evident here.

Nature

This effect was not evident in primiparous animals.

Journal of Dairy Science

A similar result was not evident among male officers.

Psychiatry Research

The fatigue was not evident early in the match.

The New York Times - Sports

But that component was not evident in the agreement today.

The New York Times

If he ever truly relaxed, it was not evident.

The New York Times

Such magnanimity was not evident on the men's side.

The New York Times - Magazine

What progress he made was not evident in his scores.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Bergrin's much-noted brashness was not evident.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not evident" to indicate a lack of clear visibility or obvious presence of something, particularly when discussing findings, observations, or results. This phrase adds a degree of formality and objectivity to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was not evident" when describing personal feelings or subjective experiences. This phrase is better suited for objective observations or findings. For personal experiences, consider using phrases like "did not feel" or "did not seem".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not evident" functions as a declarative statement indicating the absence of clear visibility or obvious presence. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It's commonly used to express that something lacks clear proof or indication in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was not evident" is a versatile phrase used to express the absence of clear evidence or visibility. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across various contexts, particularly in science and news media. While "was not evident" maintains a neutral to formal register, alternatives like "was not apparent" or "was not obvious" can provide subtle nuances in meaning. Remember to use it in objective contexts for greatest impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not apparent

Replaces "evident" with "apparent", suggesting something was not easily seen or understood.

was not obvious

Substitutes "evident" with "obvious", indicating that something was not easily perceived or clear.

was not noticeable

Replaces "evident" with "noticeable", focusing on the lack of something being easily observed.

was not discernible

Uses "discernible" in place of "evident", highlighting that something could not be clearly distinguished.

was not perceptible

Employs "perceptible" instead of "evident", indicating that something was not able to be sensed or noticed.

did not appear

Shifts the focus to the lack of appearance rather than evidence.

did not emerge

Indicates that something did not come into view or become known.

remained unseen

Emphasizes the continuous state of something not being seen.

was not detected

Focuses on the lack of detection, often used in scientific or technical contexts.

went unnoticed

Highlights that something was not observed or paid attention to.

FAQs

How can I use "was not evident" in a sentence?

The phrase "was not evident" is used to indicate that something was not clearly visible or apparent. For example, "The impact of the new policy "was not evident" in the initial results."

What are some alternatives to "was not evident"?

You can use alternatives such as "was not apparent", "was not obvious", or "was not noticeable" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "wasn't evident"?

Yes, "wasn't evident" is the contracted form of "was not evident" and is grammatically correct. It's suitable for informal writing, while "was not evident" is preferred in formal contexts.

What is the difference between "was not evident" and "was not obvious"?

While both phrases indicate a lack of clarity, ""was not evident"" suggests that something lacked clear proof or indication, while "was not obvious" suggests that something was not easily perceived or understood.