was not created

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not created" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something did not come into existence or was not made at a certain time or by a certain person. Example: "The document was not created until after the meeting had concluded."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Folk art was not created for museums.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"Jeux" was not created to shock.

The New York Times - Arts

Sandy, it claimed, was not created by God at all.

The Economist

This spot was not created by an agency, but internally.

The New York Times

"Hip-hop was not created based on hatred," he said.

The New Yorker

Like all of Freud's work, the painting was not created to flatter.

The New York Times

The Baileys commercial was not created for the Academy Awards program.

The New York Times

The Ladies European Tourr was not created until 1978, almost 30 years after the L.P.G.A. Tour.

The New York Times - Sports

It was not created by an executive order of the president.

The New York Times

But the Children's Laureate was not created for great literature or illustration alone.

Independent

It's hard to believe that this cartoon was not created to be deliberately ambiguous.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "was not created", ensure the context clearly indicates what did the creating (or failing to create) and why this lack of creation is significant.

Common error

Avoid using "was not created" without clearly specifying what the creating agent is, otherwise the sentence may lack clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not created" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence did not come into existence or was not brought about by an agent. According to Ludwig, this usage is correct and common in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Science

22%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not created" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to negate the origin or authorship of something. Ludwig confirms that its versatility makes it suitable for various registers, ranging from news articles to scientific papers. It is particularly frequent in the News & Media and Science domains. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context regarding the potential creator to maintain clarity. Ludwig's analysis and examples provide a comprehensive understanding of its appropriate usage, alternatives, and potential pitfalls.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not designed

Emphasizes the lack of intention or planning in its formation.

was never formed

Highlights the absence of formation or construction.

was not produced

Emphasizes the lack of manufacturing or generation.

was not generated

Focuses on the absence of a process that produces something.

did not originate

Focuses on the point of origin rather than the act of creation.

was not invented

Focuses on the absence of an inventive act or discovery.

was not established

Highlights that an organization, system, or idea was not set up.

was not developed

Suggests that something didn't undergo a process of growth or improvement.

was not instituted

Similar to established, but emphasizes the formal introduction of something.

did not come into being

A more formal way of saying something did not start to exist.

FAQs

How can I use "was not created" in a sentence?

Use "was not created" to indicate that something did not come into existence or was not made at a certain time or by a specific person. For example: "The universe "was not created" in a vacuum".

What are some alternatives to "was not created"?

You can use alternatives such as "did not originate", "was not designed", or "did not come into being" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "was not created" or "never created"?

The choice between "was not created" and "never created" depends on the context. "Was not created" implies a specific time or purpose for which something was absent. "Never created" indicates that something has not ever existed. Both are grammatically correct but their usage depends on meaning.

What's the difference between "was not created" and "was not built"?

"Was not created" is a broader term indicating something didn't come into existence. "Was not built" specifically refers to the lack of construction or assembly. For example, a feeling "was not created", while a building "was not built".