was not considered

USAGE SUMMARY

"was not considered" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used whenever you want to express that something was not given any thought or reflection. For example: The potential financial benefits of the new project were not considered.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was not considered decent.

The New York Times

(Drunkenness was not considered a vice).

The New Yorker

But it was not considered sufficient.

The New York Times

"It was not considered interesting scientifically.

The New York Times - Magazine

Crime was not considered a big problem.

The New York Times

Heartbreak was not considered a success.

The Guardian - Books

One problem was not considered by the report, however.

The Guardian

Fatigue behaviour was not considered.

Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar

The contamination was not considered.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

However, the passenger behavior was not considered.

Urban Rail Transit

Rate diversity was not considered in either.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not considered" to clearly state that a particular aspect, factor, or option was not given attention or was deliberately left out of consideration in a specific context. This adds clarity and precision to your writing.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "was not considered" if it obscures who did the considering. If possible, rephrase to specify the actor, e.g., "The committee did not consider the proposal."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not considered" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject was not given attention or thought. As evidenced by Ludwig, this phrase is frequently employed to highlight omissions or oversights.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

51%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was not considered" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that something was omitted or not given attention. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely applicable, particularly in scientific and news contexts. The phrase is suitable for neutral or formal settings, allowing writers to objectively highlight oversights or exclusions. While alternatives exist, such as ""was overlooked"" or ""was disregarded"", the choice depends on the specific context and desired nuance. Remember to use it judiciously, ensuring clarity and avoiding overuse of the passive voice to maintain the impact and precision of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was disregarded

Indicates that something was ignored or treated as unimportant.

was overlooked

Suggests that something was missed or not noticed.

was dismissed

Implies that something was rejected or deemed unworthy of attention.

was ignored

Similar to disregarded, but can also suggest a deliberate act of ignoring.

was left out of consideration

More explicit and formal way of saying something wasn't thought about.

was not taken into account

Highlights that something was not factored into a decision or assessment.

was excluded

Indicates a deliberate act of keeping something out.

was not factored in

More informal way to say that something was not taken into account.

was unheeded

Suggests that advice or a warning was ignored.

did not give weight to

Emphasizes a lack of importance assigned to something.

FAQs

How can I use "was not considered" in a sentence?

You can use "was not considered" to indicate that something wasn't taken into account or given attention. For instance, "The environmental impact "was not considered" during the initial planning phase."

What are some alternatives to "was not considered"?

Alternatives include "was overlooked", "was disregarded", or "was not taken into account". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was not considered"?

While "was not considered" is in the passive voice, using the active voice can sometimes provide greater clarity. For example, instead of "The budget "was not considered"", you could say "The committee did not consider the budget."

What's the difference between "was not considered" and "was ignored"?

"Was not considered" suggests a lack of attention or thought, while "was ignored" implies a deliberate act of disregarding or overlooking something. The former is neutral, while the latter has a negative connotation.