was not characterised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not characterised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that did not have a particular quality or feature attributed to it in the past. Example: "The event was not characterised by the usual excitement that we have come to expect."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

According to the BBC's Once Upon A Time In New York: The Birth Of Hip Hop, Disco And Punk, it wasn't that the Big Apple of the 1970s was not characterised by its world of opportunities - but by its lack of them.

The Guardian - Music

However this immune response was not characterised.

British Journal of Cancer

Atrial fibrillation was not characterised as transient or sustained in the RESPECT study.

BMJ Open

In general florfenicol was not characterised by any overt signs of toxicity or pathological changes in the treated birds.

BMC Veterinary Research

Asterisk indicates a possible dimer of RseP-HM (Koide et al., 2008 ) that was not characterised further.

eLife

The process was not characterised by intensive discussions in society or at parliamentary level, as is often seen in more pluralistic countries (25, 26).

Global Health Action

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

"In addition, the presenter made clear that he was not characterising all Muslims as violent extremists".

The Guardian

The pages that are not characterised by bitterness and bile do not make gripping reading.

The Guardian - Books

Academic economics, in any flavour or school of thought, is not characterised by steady scientific progress just because economists wish it were so.

The Guardian - Business

Tellingly, a wedding is not characterised as an opportunity to be a queen, and to enjoy the perhaps more distinguished, and potent, form of regality that implies.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

OCD affects up to 1.2 million people in the UK, and despite popular understanding, it's not characterised by orderliness, cleanliness or germ-phobia.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not characterised", ensure that the context clearly indicates what aspects were not defined or described. Be specific about what characteristics were missing.

Common error

While "was not characterised" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where appropriate to improve clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not characterised" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject did not receive a specific characterization. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and common in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

77%

News & Media

23%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not characterised" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction that indicates a lack of specific definition or description. As validated by Ludwig AI, it's frequently found in scientific and news contexts and is suitable for formal writing. While effective, be mindful of passive voice overuse. Related phrases such as "was not defined" or "was not described" can offer alternative phrasing for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not defined

Emphasizes a lack of precise definition or boundaries.

was not identified

Focuses on the absence of recognition or detection of specific features.

was not described

Highlights that something lacked a detailed account or representation.

was not classified

Indicates a failure to assign something to a specific category.

remained uncharacterized

Emphasizes the continuing lack of characterization.

was not specified

Highlights the absence of explicit details or conditions.

was not determined

Focuses on the lack of ascertainment or establishment of something.

lacked characterization

Uses a noun phrase to express the absence of characterization.

was not distinguished

Emphasizes the absence of differentiation from other things.

defied categorization

Highlights an inability to be placed into any specific group or type.

FAQs

What does "was not characterised" mean?

The phrase "was not characterised" means that something lacked specific qualities or features that could define or describe it. It suggests an absence of detailed description or identification.

How can I use "was not characterised" in a sentence?

You can use "was not characterised" to indicate that a subject lacks specific defining features. For example: "The immune response "was not characterized" in detail".

What can I say instead of "was not characterised"?

Alternatives to "was not characterised" include /s/"was+not+defined", /s/"was+not+described", or /s/"remained+uncharacterized", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. Each alternative provides a slightly different emphasis on the missing attributes.

Is "was not characterised" formal or informal?

"Was not characterised" is generally considered formal and suitable for academic, scientific, or professional writing. More informal contexts might use simpler phrasing, but it's appropriate for a range of writing styles.